From the sounds of that article, it seems unlikely that Sodhi will get a game in the first place, and that they're only bringing him along as a part of a learning experience and to keep him in a fully professional environment. Of course, I wouldn't be surprised if McHesson choose to do an Agar, especially if New Zealand struggle in the first test.haha. Really though, if Astle wasn't selected for this of all tours, I can't see what his route back into the team is.
If Sodhi fails, then that's how he'll get back. But like the Lyon/Agar situation, do we really want someone brought back because their replacement failed? It's such a bad policy.
So much better to have someone knock the door down for selection than risk the confidence of two players backing unproven talent.
Yeah the new owners of this restaurant are noticeably keener to serve me a 'she'll be right on the night' taste of Kiwi, if the current A Tour top 6 and this Ish 180 are the indication.National selection manager Kim Littlejohn acknowledged there are furrowed brows at a high level.
"Yes there is a gap and yes we are concerned," he said yesterday. "There are some young spinners coming through the system but they are a long way off.
"If you look at someone like Ish Sodhi he needs time to develop. He's basically just out of school so we think it's not very wise for us to throw him in the deep end. We are looking at a few options.
isn't Brownlie ****house in the SC though?
Two ways of looking at it. Brownlie is poor against spin (though apparently has been working hard on it) so this could be seen either as a reason to drop him or as a prime opportunity for him to improve against non-top-tier spin bowlers. I'd go with the latter at this stage.I reckon Anderson would actually probably be a better bet than Brownlie for this series. He'd be more at home on the slow pitches in Bangladesh, and obviously has had recent success against sub-standard bowling attacks in the sub-continent. But Brownlie deserves to keep his place for a while longer.
Yeah, young Dan was pretty peculiar in the history of New Zealand cricket. Cracking 100 wickets by the time he was 21 and doing that at an average of 32...we grizzle about how he's never one us a game with the ball, but he actually did it in his very first season:17y/o Vettori >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sodhi (or Agar, for that matter)
Hard to believe Vettori played with guys so completely from another era - e.g. Dipak Patel, and is still going. Blair Pocock 83 and Heath Davis 5/63; what a time to be alive.
The guy averaged nearly sixty with the ball last season.Gotta be Astle for me
I think you need a wrist spinner, was the best wicket-taker on this a tour out of the spinners, I think he'd do OKThe guy averaged nearly sixty with the ball last season.