What a marvellous journey its been. Bradman - really nothing to say that hasn't already been said. What a ridiculous player. Brilliant work DoG. Looking forward very much to the bowlers list, hoping some of my favourites (Grimmett, O'Reilly, Barnes) aren't punished too harshly for their lack of matches.
ATG World XI
1. J.B Hobbs 2. H. Sutcliffe 3. D.G Bradman 4. W.R Hammond 5. G.S Sobers 6. M.J Procter 7. A.C Gilchrist 8. M.D Marshall 9. S.K Warne 10. M. Muralitharan 11. G.D McGrath
If the career points cap is removed, then Lara would be the 2nd in the list with 961, and Tendulkar will be #4. I would settle for that ranking. I don't think Sangakkara is a better batsman than SRT at the moment.
Diuretics are used to look good at TV shows
I played for 20 years in the Lankan team, I did not have any problems as a Tamil - Muralidaran
Indians can't bowl - Where has the rumour come from as I myself and many indian friends arwe competent fast bowlers ?
With the English bid I said: Let us be brief. If you give back the Falkland Islands, which belong to us, you will get my vote. They then became sad and left
Maybe someone like Syd Gregory or Alistair Campbell?
THE ULTIMATE CRICKET WEB ARCADE EGGS CHAMPION
RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1990-2006
RIP Craig Walsh (AKA "Craig"), 1985-2012
And another request. How much points Sangakkara will get as a pure batsman (non-wk)?
yes DoG. Can you calculate points for sangakkara purely as a batsman. That would be interesting
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW
Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta
thanks for putting in so much hard work and coming up with such a fantastic exercise.
Will be waiting for the bowling lists
Once again I have to say, a job well done
That's also like saying whats Sobers points when he didn't have to open the bowling or from when he was picked as a batsman only and not as a spin bowler.
What really is the point of that? One can only be rated on what they actually did, not on what could have been.
Simpson^ | Hayden | Bradman | Chappell^ | Ponting | Border* | Gilchrist+ | Davidson3 | Warne4^ | Lillee1 | McGrath2
Greenidge | Hunte | Richards^ | Headley* | Lara^ | Sobers5^ | Walcott+ | Marshall1 | Ambrose2 | Holding3 | Garner4
Richards^ | Smith*^ | Amla | Pollock | Kallis5^ | Nourse | Waite+ | Procter3 | Steyn1 | Tayfield4 | Donald2
Hobbs | Hutton*^ | Hammond^ | Compton | Barrington | Botham5^ | Knott | Trueman1 | Laker4 | Larwood2 | Barnes3
DoG, great work this. Been amazing reading this
Bradman! Would be interesting to know in which of those numbers he was not ranked first. Man, he is so insane that sometime I wish someone would tell me that he was fiction and not real.
DoG, I assume you made a mistake when you said Lara ranked 1st in Great innings with 11, as you've just written that Bradman had 15.
Nah there was this meeting the other day and 11 is more than 15 now. They obviously didn't send you the memo.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)