Craig
World Traveller
I discussed my first I would change with Mr M on MSN and told me his rule change. I am sure he will post his.
Anyway this mine:
If a team has a reserve wicket keeper in their squad and if main 'keeper (the one who's playing) gets injuried, then then the reserve 'keeper should come on and replace the injuried one, instead of having some part-timer 'keep wickets, but hasnt done so for a number of years or isnt a specialist.
I see this like goalkeepers in football (soccer), and if your no.1 'keeper gets injuried or sent off, then you are allowed to bring your reserve goalie on (assuming you havent used your three subs up), so why not in cricket?
If Patel gets injuried, India would be better off having Dasgupta come on, then have Dravid 'keep.
Thoughts please.
PS - I wont be on until Boxing Day (when I have finshed being online) so I would like to say for all those out there who celebrate x-mas, have a happy and safe christmas, have a great day, be careful and DONT DRINK AND DRIVE.
Anyway this mine:
If a team has a reserve wicket keeper in their squad and if main 'keeper (the one who's playing) gets injuried, then then the reserve 'keeper should come on and replace the injuried one, instead of having some part-timer 'keep wickets, but hasnt done so for a number of years or isnt a specialist.
I see this like goalkeepers in football (soccer), and if your no.1 'keeper gets injuried or sent off, then you are allowed to bring your reserve goalie on (assuming you havent used your three subs up), so why not in cricket?
If Patel gets injuried, India would be better off having Dasgupta come on, then have Dravid 'keep.
Thoughts please.
PS - I wont be on until Boxing Day (when I have finshed being online) so I would like to say for all those out there who celebrate x-mas, have a happy and safe christmas, have a great day, be careful and DONT DRINK AND DRIVE.