• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

New feature - Lohmannesque?

Days of Grace

International Captain
Good article on an often forgotten cricketer.

My own standarised average of Lohmann is 23.94 with is strike-rate also increasing to 55 from 34. However, he still took a standarised 5.39 wickets per match, and most impressive of all was his win record. He contributed to a team win in 18 innings (I define a contribution as usually 3 wickets or more). That's 18 innings in 18 matches, a 100% record, which no one else can match. The next best is Barnes with 81% and then Steyn with 78%.

Crucially, the overall aggregate of runs and wickets in matches in which Lohmann played in is 10650 runs for 630 wickets, an average of 16.90. If we take Lohmann out of it, then the runs per wicket average of those matches increases to 18.23, still a very low average.

Coupled with that, not only did Lohmann play against the minnow South Africans, but he also made merry against the weakest Australian batting lineups in history. Australia were very weak once the nucleus of the 1880-1882 team left the game, and after the famous win at the Oval in 1882, they only beat England in 5 matches until 1892, to go with 16 losses.

Just my two cents. :)
 

chasingthedon

International Regular
Thanks for your comments Steve. So you found a similar increase to Charles Davis - were all bowlers of that time impacted to that degree?
 

Days of Grace

International Captain
Thanks for your comments Steve. So you found a similar increase to Charles Davis - were all bowlers of that time impacted to that degree?
Of the players before the Great War whose averages I have adjusted (and in the order that I have ranked them):

Barnes 16.43 - 19.91 (x1.21)
Lohmann 10.75 - 23.94 (2.23)
Richardson 25.22 - 27.97 (1.11) - My favorite player from that era
Trumble 21.78 - 27.04 (1.24)
Blythe 18.63 - 24.30 (1.30)
Turner 16.53 - 25.12 (1.52)
Spofforth 18.41 - 26.25 (1.43)
Peel 16.98 - 27.37 (1.61)
Briggs 17.75 - 26.47 (1.49)
Palmer 21.51 - 28.99 (1.35)
Bates 16.42 - 24.67 (1.50)

Peel, Briggs, and Bates were teammates of Lohmann.
 

chasingthedon

International Regular
So Lohmann does have the largest adjustment. Despite that, and ignoring Barnes who came a bit later, Lohmann does manage to maintain the lowest adjusted average of the era.

Good work there Steve.
 

Top