Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 119
Like Tree6Likes

Thread: Who is the most overated player from the subcontinent, ever?

  1. #31
    Virat Kohli (c) Jono's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    55,028
    Quote Originally Posted by Jono View Post
    Nasser Hussain
    Quote Originally Posted by flibbertyjibber View Post
    Got to be rated first.
    Quote Originally Posted by wpdavid View Post
    Nah. I don't know anyone who thinks he was an ATG. If anything he's rather under-rated by folks who don't bother looking beyond his overall test average.
    First and last time I ever make a Richard joke.

    Screw you guys.

  2. #32
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Uppercut's Avatar
    Tournaments Won: 1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    .
    Posts
    23,649
    Quote Originally Posted by kyear2 View Post
    Akran is a funny case, if Cricinfo was c alling him the third best fast bowler or best bowling All Rounder then he was over rated, but from reading an interview afterwards, that was probably not the case "There's no point picking four new-ball bowlers if only two can share it", it's possible Akran was selected as he was a wizard with the old ball and would also provide variety with his LH fast bowling and also provide some extra footmarks for Warne and Sobers. In that scenario he isn't over rated but part of a great attack.
    Just my take.
    Yeah I think more people underrate him than overrate him because they don't consider this.

    It's a textbook troll but I genuinely think it's Tendulkar.
    Quote Originally Posted by zaremba View Post
    The Filth have comfortably the better bowling. But the Gash have the batting. Might be quite good to watch.

  3. #33
    Virat Kohli (c) Jono's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    55,028
    Quote Originally Posted by Cabinet96 View Post
    Great players can still be overrated.
    Its amazing that people never understand this.

    I agree that Tendulkar is overrated in the strictest definition - i.e. that some think he is a guaranteed #2 of all time or even better than Bradman. That is overrating him. He is still an all time great though.

    Just like can say that a great is underrated. E.g. I sometimes think McGrath is underrated (maybe not on here). I believe he is so clearly in the top 10 best cricketers of all time, that anyone who doesn't think that is underrating him.

    The colloquial use of overrated/underrated has basically become "I think he's actually ****" or "i think he's actually good"
    BeeGee and honestbharani like this.

  4. #34
    International Vice-Captain kyear2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    w.i
    Posts
    4,101
    Quote Originally Posted by Jono View Post
    Its amazing that people never understand this.

    I agree that Tendulkar is overrated in the strictest definition - i.e. that some think he is a guaranteed #2 of all time or even better than Bradman. That is overrating him. He is still an all time great though.

    Just like can say that a great is underrated. E.g. I sometimes think McGrath is underrated (maybe not on here). I believe he is so clearly in the top 10 best cricketers of all time, that anyone who doesn't think that is underrating him.

    The colloquial use of overrated/underrated has basically become "I think he's actually ****" or "i think he's actually good"
    Nice post.
    Aus. XI
    Simpson^ | Hayden | Bradman | Chappell^ | Ponting | Border* | Gilchrist+ | Davidson3 | Warne4^ | Lillee1 | McGrath2


    W.I. XI
    Greenidge | Hunte | Richards^ | Headley* | Lara^ | Sobers5^ | Walcott+ | Marshall1 | Ambrose2 | Holding3 | Garner4

    S.A. XI
    Richards^ | Smith*^ | Amla | Pollock | Kallis5^ | Nourse | Waite+ | Procter3 | Steyn1 | Tayfield4 | Donald2

    Eng. XI
    Hobbs | Hutton*^ | Hammond^ | Compton | Barrington | Botham5^ | Knott | Trueman1 | Laker4 | Larwood2 | Barnes3


  5. #35
    International Vice-Captain watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,936
    Quote Originally Posted by kyear2 View Post
    Akran is a funny case, if Cricinfo was c alling him the third best fast bowler or best bowling All Rounder then he was over rated, but from reading an interview afterwards, that was probably not the case "There's no point picking four new-ball bowlers if only two can share it", it's possible Akran was selected as he was a wizard with the old ball and would also provide variety with his LH fast bowling and also provide some extra footmarks for Warne and Sobers. In that scenario he isn't over rated but part of a great attack.
    Just my take.
    Good point kyear.

    Akram as a change bowler to the likes of Marshall & Lillee seems fair enough to me as someone has to clean up the tail. And he was certainly good at doing that.
    "Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong" - Oscar Wilde

  6. #36
    International Vice-Captain watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,936
    Anil Kumble is over-rated as his greatness relies too heavily on longevity and success on home turf. Chandra and Prasanna are comfortably better and greater Indian spinners IMO.

  7. #37
    International Vice-Captain kyear2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    w.i
    Posts
    4,101
    Quote Originally Posted by watson View Post
    Anil Kumble is over-rated as his greatness relies too heavily on longevity and success on home turf. Chandra and Prasanna are comfortably better and greater Indian spinners IMO.
    Fully agree.

  8. #38
    Virat Kohli (c) Jono's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    55,028
    Quote Originally Posted by watson View Post
    Anil Kumble is over-rated as his greatness relies too heavily on longevity and success on home turf. Chandra and Prasanna are comfortably better and greater Indian spinners IMO.
    So if people have Kumble in the same pack as them you believe he is overrated, as you think he's clearly below them?

    Interesting viewpoint. Don't mind it, even if I disagree.

  9. #39
    International Coach morgieb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Dishing out broken ****ing floggings
    Posts
    11,100
    Jeetan Patel

  10. #40
    Request Your Custom Title Now! Flem274*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    ksfls;fsl;lsFJg/s
    Posts
    28,452
    No one rates him.
    ankitj likes this.
    Quote Originally Posted by Athlai View Post
    Jeets doesn't really deserve to be bowling.
    Quote Originally Posted by Athlai View Post
    Well yeah Tendy is probably better than Bradman, but Bradman was 70 years ago, if he grew up in the modern era he'd still easily be the best. Though he wasn't, can understand the argument for Tendy even though I don't agree.
    Proudly supporting Central Districts
    RIP Craig Walsh

  11. #41
    International Vice-Captain watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,936
    Quote Originally Posted by Jono View Post
    So if people have Kumble in the same pack as them you believe he is overrated, as you think he's clearly below them?

    Interesting viewpoint. Don't mind it, even if I disagree.
    Yes, Kumble is clearly 'below' Chandra and Prasanna IMO. And possibly Bedi.

    The main reason being that Chandra and Prasanna both had successful overseas tours. Chandra dominated the 1971 series in England against Illingsworth's team, and Prasanna was the outstanding bowler during the 1967/68 series in Australia. There is nothing similar in Kumble's CV that I can find. Although I'm happy to be corrected.

  12. #42
    International Debutant
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Dunno. I say Marco you say Polo.
    Posts
    2,070
    Our squad recently dusted 4 blot are collectively the worst to go to the sub con.

    From the sub con,,,hmmm. Using jono's definition that you can be great and over rated, I nominate Gavaskar for the supermanning of his record v WI.

  13. #43
    International Vice-Captain watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,936
    Quote Originally Posted by the big bambino View Post
    Our squad recently dusted 4 blot are collectively the worst to go to the sub con.

    From the sub con,,,hmmm. Using jono's definition that you can be great and over rated, I nominate Gavaskar for the supermanning of his record v WI.
    Yeah, that's a tricky one with good arguments from both sides.

    Just checked on Statsguru. Gavaskar and Michael Holding played against eachother in 15 Test matches (1976-1983). Gavaskar scored 1135 runs at 45.40 with 5 centuries during those Test matches.

    To my mind that isn't bad. My only real criticism is that Gavaskar seemed to be inconsistent - he either scored not much, or very big. But could Hobbs and Hutton have done any better in the same circumstances? Probably not as I can't imagine an opening batsman with a straighter defensive bat, and a better hook/pull-shot. Then there was that cover-drive down on one knee.....

  14. #44
    Hall of Fame Member Howe_zat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Top floor, bottom buzzer
    Posts
    16,431
    Quote Originally Posted by watson View Post
    Yeah, that's a tricky one with good arguments from both sides.

    Just checked on Statsguru. Gavaskar and Michael Holding played against eachother in 15 Test matches (1976-1983). Gavaskar scored 1135 runs at 45.40 with 5 centuries during those Test matches.

    To my mind that isn't bad. My only real criticism is that Gavaskar seemed to be inconsistent - he either scored not much, or very big. But could Hobbs and Hutton have done any better in the same circumstances? Probably not as I can't imagine an opening batsman with a straighter defensive bat, and a better hook/pull-shot. Then there was that cover-drive down on one knee.....
    Gavaskar's record against the Windies is often cited as evidence of him conquering their best ever (probably the best ever) pace battery, but it's actually quite misleading because of how often he scored against them either before that pace attack came through or when they were at WSC.

    Edit: story given in detail here
    Last edited by Howe_zat; 10-06-2013 at 10:51 PM.
    Every 5 years we have an election and have to decide who are the least obnoxious out of all the men. Then one gets in and they age really quickly. Which is always fun to watch.

  15. #45
    International Vice-Captain watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,936
    Quote Originally Posted by Howe_zat View Post
    Gavaskar's record against the Windies is often cited as evidence of him conquering their best ever (probably the best ever) pace battery, but it's actually quite misleading because of how often he scored against them either before that pace attack came through or when they were at WSC.

    Edit: story given in detail here
    I would have to question the quality of the article. I think that it's exaggerating its main point and being overly picky;

    According to Statsguru;

    Holding AND Roberts V Gavaskar
    Tests = 9 (1976-83, 7 in the WI)
    Ave = 53.07
    100s = 3
    Runs = 690

    Holding AND Marshall V Gavaskar
    Test = 11 (1983, 5 in the WI)
    Ave = 41.38
    100s = 3
    Runs = 745

    Holding AND Roberts AND Marshall V Gavaskar
    Tests = 7 (1983, 5 in the WI)
    Ave = 49.60
    100s = 2
    Runs = 496
    Last edited by watson; 11-06-2013 at 12:30 AM.

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Afridi Overated?
    By jammay123 in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 28-02-2007, 06:38 AM
  2. Overated wicketkeepers
    By andmark in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 07-12-2006, 03:33 AM
  3. Most Overated Player
    By pontingrulz in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28-12-2003, 05:30 AM
  4. Trescothick is overated.
    By Eclipse in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 13-09-2003, 04:44 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •