Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22-04-2013, 04:09 PM   #1 (permalink)
International 12th Man
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 1,704
Great bowling and batting partnerships

In the thread with top order percentage stats for players I was interested in seeing Jim Laker's stats skew so heavily towards middle and top order players, especially considering he wouldn't have obviously bowled with the new ball. This made me look up his stats when bowling with various other players, Trueman, Statham, Wardle, Lock and so on.

I'd obviously known that Lock and Laker were a fearsome partnership that helped bowl England to being the best team in the world in the mid-50s, but their stats when bowling together are quite incredible.

They played 24 test matches together between 1952-1959.

Laker's stats - 119 wickets, 15.87 ave, 1.80 econ, 52.9 SR
Lock's stats - 92 wickets, 20.40 ave, 1.85 econ, 65.9 SR

Interestingly, despite Lock having the reputation of being the more attacking of the two, Laker had a significantly better strike rate when they bowled together.

To go a bit further, if you look at their stats when they both played together at home, it's really ridiculous. In 16 tests the pair featured alongside each other in England, Laker took 81 wickets at 12.10 and Lock took 76 wickets at 12.64.

Has there ever been a more fearsome combination than facing Laker and Lock on an English turner?
pskov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2013, 04:56 PM   #2 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
kyear2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: w.i
Posts: 2,495
Marshall and Garner had a pretty good run while opening the bowling together. Mcgrath and Warne were just legendary.

Batting wise the obvious ones are Hayden and Langer, Hobbs and Sutcliffe, and I think Tendulkar and Dravid.
__________________
1st XI
Hutton | Hobbs | Bradman | Richards | Tendulkar | Sobers | Gilchrist | Khan | Marshall | Warne | McGrath
2nd XI
Sutcliffe | Gavaskar | Headley | Chappell | Lara | Kallis | Miller | Knott | Ambrose | Lillee | Muralitharan
3rd XI
Greenidge | Morris | Ponting | Pollock | Hammond | Worrell | Ames | Hadlee | Holding | Trueman | O'Reilly
4th XI
Richards | Simpson | Sangakkara | Weekes | Border | Walcott | Botham | Lindwall | Laker | Garner | Barnes
kyear2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-04-2013, 10:21 PM   #3 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
smalishah84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: dxb
Posts: 18,856
Wasim and Waqar were an awesome combo....although I am not sure their averages were anywhere close to 10 and 12
__________________
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW

Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta
smalishah84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-04-2013, 12:10 AM   #4 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
fredfertang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: high dudgeon
Posts: 9,715
Quote:
Originally Posted by pskov View Post
In the thread with top order percentage stats for players I was interested in seeing Jim Laker's stats skew so heavily towards middle and top order players, especially considering he wouldn't have obviously bowled with the new ball. This made me look up his stats when bowling with various other players, Trueman, Statham, Wardle, Lock and so on.

I'd obviously known that Lock and Laker were a fearsome partnership that helped bowl England to being the best team in the world in the mid-50s, but their stats when bowling together are quite incredible.

They played 24 test matches together between 1952-1959.

Laker's stats - 119 wickets, 15.87 ave, 1.80 econ, 52.9 SR
Lock's stats - 92 wickets, 20.40 ave, 1.85 econ, 65.9 SR

Interestingly, despite Lock having the reputation of being the more attacking of the two, Laker had a significantly better strike rate when they bowled together.

To go a bit further, if you look at their stats when they both played together at home, it's really ridiculous. In 16 tests the pair featured alongside each other in England, Laker took 81 wickets at 12.10 and Lock took 76 wickets at 12.64.

Has there ever been a more fearsome combination than facing Laker and Lock on an English turner?
The daft bit is that over that period England played, if my basic addition is correct, 53 Tests, and neither of them were injured for a significant period
fredfertang is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Battrick James Battrick 2450 18-12-2012 03:55 AM
Where should i improve ash chaulk Battrick 408 05-06-2008 05:59 AM
my team bugssy Battrick 68 18-04-2007 06:00 AM
Archived [18/10/06] : Battrick DJellett Battrick 10623 17-10-2006 12:20 PM
**Official** Club Cricket (8-9) Mr Mxyzptlk CW Offseason Club Cricket 742 08-09-2005 07:38 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web