needs a new avatar imo
Exit pursuing a beerOriginally Posted by Jimmy Neesham
I think that number of outs should be counted to the score.
I think that that 170-9 is better than 169-0 is very strange. Isn't it possible to count the outs in the score? For example, point deduction by every out.
What a waste of ink.
Batsman I tolerate: V. Richards, S. Tendulkar, E. Morgan, N. Hussain. KEVIN O F******* BRIEN
lol @ indoor cricket with 1 hand 1 bounce: where the **** are you meant to hit the ball??
If a fielder gets 'injured'* they are allowed a substitute, however the substitute can only field - they cannot bowl, and the original player bats in their innings.
*'injured' also tends to refer to fast bowlers wanting a break, a change of boots, toilet break or other reason for leaving the field.
I'd love to see T20s played with a different rule.
Instead of 4 overs per bowler, every player on the fielding team must bowl 2 overs (except the wicketkeeper). Would be brilliant to watch how captains approached it tactically, and it would be interesting to see how much it impacts selections. Would also just be fun to see guys who don't normally bowl have a trundle.
Teams of bit-part all rounders being selected, IMO.
de Villiers +
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)