|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Cricket Web Staff Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: high dudgeon
Posts: 9,716
|
Rapprochement
Rapprochement
Interest in the Bodyline tour is as strong as ever, but in truth the next Ashes series lost little in comparison, even though it is seldom now recalled. In this feature Martin tells the story of the 1936/37 Tests |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
First Class Debutant
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dunno. I say Marco you say Polo.
Posts: 806
|
I think Sutcliffe was past it and Hutton and Compton too young. I forget who (Wellings I think) called the non selection of Bowes and Paynter one of the worst bits of selectorship he'd seen. Add Larwood to those 2 and England may very well have won the series without bodyline. Most of all though the player they didn't need was Bradman. Australia's batting was vulnerable in this series and Eng may well have swept the series - but for the Don.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Cricket Web Staff Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: high dudgeon
Posts: 9,716
|
'tis true that Sutcliffe would've been 42 by the time the first Test begun, but he had three excellent seasons for Yorkshire still to come, and he couldn't have been less effective than Fagg, Fishlock and Worthington
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
First Class Debutant
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dunno. I say Marco you say Polo.
Posts: 806
|
True enough. He was a champion. I have a feeling that Bowes didn't make the tour bcos he and Allen had a strong dislike of each other. Saw the animosity btwn the 2 on a documentary about bodyline.
Copson was an interesting selection and on figures deserved his spot but a bout of injuries kept him from playing tests though he topped the fc averages. I've read newspaper accounts of the tour and they mentioned his ability to get lift and "fizz" from the wickets. An article from a friend, Easterbrook credited him with getting life even out of flat wickets so I think he could have handled Australian pitches. But you'd have to say an impartial selection process would have had Larwood and Bowes ahead of him. Even then Gover and Stephenson were unlucky. I'm a fan of the latter who seemed a real character. Overall the batting let Eng down though you can imagine a line up of Wyatt, Barnett, Hardstaff, Hammond, Leyland and Paynter with a sigh of what could have been. EDIT: Not to mention Sutcliffe
Last edited by the big bambino; 12-03-2013 at 02:45 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|