• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England in New Zealand series 2013

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
There's little in between from Rutherford is there. Goes between looking a million dollars one ball & five cents the next.
 

BeeGee

International Captain
So, what should be the NZ side for the first T20?

Hamish Rutherford
Martin Guptill
Brendon McCullum
Ross Taylor
Colin Munro
James Franklin\Grant Elliott
Andrew Ellis
Nathan McCullum
Ian Butler
Ronnie Hira\Trent Boult
Mitchell McClenaghan

Do we know if Butler is injured?
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
So, what should be the NZ side for the first T20?

Hamish Rutherford
Martin Guptill
Brendon McCullum
Ross Taylor
Colin Munro
James Franklin\Grant Elliott
Andrew Ellis
Nathan McCullum
Ian Butler
Ronnie Hira\Trent Boult
Mitchell McClenaghan

Do we know if Butler is injured?
Not too far off that. Would imagine Franklin and Elliott are marginally ahead of Ellis based on their short-form efforts in SA, albeit being the ODI's.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
Not too far off that. Would imagine Franklin and Elliott are marginally ahead of Ellis based on their short-form efforts in SA, albeit being the ODI's.
Agree, plus we just don't need that many bowlers. Leave out Ellis for Elliott/Franklin or a batsman. Munro can bowl too if needed.
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Okay, let's see if Broom looks any better at international level after these 2-3 years.
 

_Ed_

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The WASP is well named. Much like the creature, it's irritating and serves no useful purpose.
 

KiWiNiNjA

International Coach
The WASP is well named. Much like the creature, it's irritating and serves no useful purpose.
:laugh:

When they introduced it, it went something like this.

"Have you ever been watching the cricket, when your wife/gf/mother/sister walks into the room and asks who is winning?" WASP!!!!!



Something annoying to answer something annoying.
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Is Latham making a late charge for a spot in the top XI? Glorious sweep-stroke that. Seems to be able to hit dimensions of the ground that many can't
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The WASP is well named. Much like the creature, it's irritating and serves no useful purpose.
Agree, load of old arse this WASP. It's flawed by it's very nature. Not surprised to hear Simon Tool raving about it though.
 

Top