Cricket Player Manager
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 50

Thread: Batsmen's highest / lowest / final averages

  1. #16
    International Captain ankitj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Hyderabad India
    Posts
    6,368
    Quote Originally Posted by aussie tragic View Post
    Looking at consistancy, Javed Miandad's lowest average was 51.74 after his 45th Test (76 innings) and he retired with an average of 52.57 after 124 tests (189 innings)

    However he averaged 57.41 after 100 tests before he dropped 5 runs in his last 24 tests.
    Wow. If he retired after 100 tests, would he have been rated higher than he is? One wonders...
    RIP Phil Hughes. You were destined for cricketing glories!

  2. #17
    Virat Kohli (c) Jono's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    55,534
    Quote Originally Posted by Ikki View Post
    Around 2007 I was thinking that Ponting was a freak, his average is just going to keep going up and thought people underappreciated him. Remember arguing with Manan, him saying Ponting would need an average of 60+ to be better than Tendulkar (who at the time was in crap form IIRC).
    Quote Originally Posted by kyear2 View Post
    I recall as well thinking that Ponting was going to be remembered as the best batsman of the era, just a drastic drop off after though.
    I remember telling everyone to cool their jets when they said Ponting had a better chance of breaking Lara's highest run record over Sachin. Also said Kallis is the likeliest to break Sachins run tally as his technique is tight and hence age will affect him less than Ponting. Also the fact he is a cyborg sent from another planet to dominate cricket in all forms and in every facet.

    If Sachin or Kallis secure the highest run tally I win, but then there is the possibility of Ali Cook securing it and that prick SilentStriker wins. That will be an awful result.

  3. #18
    Cricketer Of The Year SirBloody Idiot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Moving the hole in the o-zone layer
    Posts
    8,552
    Well it'd be an awful result in the sense that we have to sit through another 8,000 Alastair Cook runs.

  4. #19
    International Vice-Captain kyear2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    w.i
    Posts
    4,250
    Lol
    Aus. XI
    Simpson^ | Hayden | Bradman | Chappell^ | Ponting | Border* | Gilchrist+ | Davidson3 | Warne4^ | Lillee1 | McGrath2


    W.I. XI
    Greenidge | Hunte | Richards^ | Headley* | Lara^ | Sobers5^ | Walcott+ | Marshall1 | Ambrose2 | Holding3 | Garner4

    S.A. XI
    Richards^ | Smith*^ | Amla | Pollock | Kallis5^ | Nourse | Cameron+ | Procter3 | Steyn1 | Tayfield4 | Donald2

    Eng. XI
    Hobbs | Hutton*^ | Hammond^ | Compton | Barrington | Botham5^ | Knott | Trueman1 | Laker4 | Larwood2 | Barnes3


  5. #20
    Englishman BoyBrumby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Gone too soon
    Posts
    45,340
    Realistically, given England plays so much more test cricket than anyone else and his realtive youth, if he stays fit Cook's a real chance to finish with the highest aggregate of test runs.

    He's played 87 tests in a little over six and a half years. He was 28 on Xmas Day, so he should have at least another 8 years ahead of him. That's about a hundred tests to come so possibly another 8k runs to add onto his current tally.

    He goes on past that and he'll be a shoo in.
    Cricket Web's 2013/14 Premier League Tipping Champion

    - As featured in The Independent.

    "I don't believe a word of Pietersen's book, but then I don't believe a word anyone else has said either."
    - Simon Barnes renders further comment on KP's autobiography superfluous in a sentence

  6. #21
    Global Moderator Fusion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,570
    Quote Originally Posted by aussie tragic View Post
    Looking at consistancy, Javed Miandad's lowest average was 51.74 after his 45th Test (76 innings) and he retired with an average of 52.57 after 124 tests (189 innings)

    However he averaged 57.41 after 100 tests before he dropped 5 runs in his last 24 tests.
    WAG. He mentioned in his biography how proud he is that his average never fell below 50 his entire career.

  7. #22
    International Coach Agent Nationaux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    10,002
    Never knew that about me and dad.

    Great player for us.

  8. #23
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Furball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    #banblocky
    Posts
    20,383
    Quote Originally Posted by Jono View Post
    Ponting definitely hit 60 in late 2006. Was never the same batsman from 2007 onwards though.
    If Ponting had scored 1 more run at Adelaide in the 2006/07 Ashes then he'd have had an average of exactly 60 at that point in his career.
    ​63*

  9. #24
    Cricketer Of The Year The Sean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,519
    Quote Originally Posted by Fusion View Post
    WAG. He mentioned in his biography how proud he is that his average never fell below 50 his entire career.
    I think that he and Herbert Sutcliffe are the only two players in history (with more than a handful of Tests) to have done that.
    Member of the Twenty20 is Boring Society

    Quote Originally Posted by grecian View Post
    C'mon Man U.
    RIP Craigos

  10. #25
    International Debutant aussie tragic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,272
    Quote Originally Posted by The Sean View Post
    I think that he and Herbert Sutcliffe are the only two players in history (with more than a handful of Tests) to have done that.
    Yes, Sutcliffe's lowest average was 60.73 which was in his last of 54 Tests (averaged 69.80 after his 40th Test).

    Frank Worrell was very close though with 49.48 after 51 Tests. He had 53.40 in his 47th and then 50.01 in his 50th before droppping below in his last Test.

  11. #26
    State Vice-Captain Coronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    1,347
    Quote Originally Posted by aussie tragic View Post
    Yes, Sutcliffe's lowest average was 60.73 which was in his last of 54 Tests (averaged 69.80 after his 40th Test).

    Frank Worrell was very close though with 49.48 after 51 Tests. He had 53.40 in his 47th and then 50.01 in his 50th before droppping below in his last Test.
    And yet people seldom rate Sutcliffe in the same bracket as Hobbs/Hutton.

  12. #27
    Virat Kohli (c) Jono's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    55,534
    Lack of surname starting with H the main issue imo.

  13. #28
    Dan
    Dan is offline
    Global Moderator / Cricket Web Staff Member Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    A small planet somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse
    Posts
    7,012
    Sutcliffe is always in contention in English (and overall) ATG sides. It's just Hobbs had the added longevity and the greater reputation, and Hutton's runscoring feats were to difficult to ignore.

    Sutcliffe is third on that list of English openers by a mile, and he's in the top 5 of all-time by my reckoning.

  14. #29
    State Vice-Captain Coronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    1,347
    Quote Originally Posted by rvd619323 View Post
    Sutcliffe is always in contention in English (and overall) ATG sides. It's just Hobbs had the added longevity and the greater reputation, and Hutton's runscoring feats were to difficult to ignore.

    Sutcliffe is third on that list of English openers by a mile, and he's in the top 5 of all-time by my reckoning.
    Yep, thats the problem for me, most rank him 3rd! I mean, being considered the 3rd best opener of all time isn't bad at all, but, a batsman of his quality can't even make it to his countries all-time XI in most peoples eyes =/. Personally I rank him between Hobbs and Hutton, with Gavaskar 4th.

  15. #30
    International Vice-Captain kyear2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    w.i
    Posts
    4,250
    Sutcliffe was always the second fiddle to the main act that was Hobbs, and that was because for people who watched them Hobbs was the better batsman and that master. Sutcliffe simply batted very slowly, even more slowly than Hutton and Hutton played againts vastly better bowlers and had a magnificant technique. Sutcliffe was also helped by the presence of Hobbs as Hobbs scoring freely at one end would have taken the pressue off of Sutcliffe and Hobbs seems to have made all who opened with him better including Rhodes.
    I would rank them Hobbs/Hutton, Gavaskar, Sutcliffe and a drop off there after. Boycott, Greenidge, Morris, Simson, Hayden (?) ect all included in the next group.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Player's Averages - What will they end with?
    By Jono in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 184
    Last Post: 26-03-2009, 05:51 PM
  2. Surrey 2002: A Cricket Captain Diary
    By SIX AND OUT in forum General
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 17-02-2005, 09:25 AM
  3. Final Averages...
    By nibbs in forum World Club Cricket
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21-02-2003, 10:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •