What is it? (only pick on performances in 2012)
For mine....
1. Cook
2. Smith
3. Amla
4. Kallis
5. Clarke
6. Chanderpaul
7. Prior
8. Philander
9. Herath
10. Siddle
11. Ajmal
Had a lot of trouble with the bowlers, batting seems fairly simple though.
What is it? (only pick on performances in 2012)
For mine....
1. Cook
2. Smith
3. Amla
4. Kallis
5. Clarke
6. Chanderpaul
7. Prior
8. Philander
9. Herath
10. Siddle
11. Ajmal
Had a lot of trouble with the bowlers, batting seems fairly simple though.
4-0
RIP Craig Walsh (Craig) 1985-2012
Proudly supporting the #2 cricketer of all time.
throwing Roach/Hearath/Anderson/Veron out there
Indians can't bowl - Where has the rumour come from as I myself and many indian friends arwe competent fast bowlers ?
With the English bid I said: Let us be brief. If you give back the Falkland Islands, which belong to us, you will get my vote. They then became sad and left
Batting:
Batting records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
Bowling:
Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
Can't really argue with your side much. On those raw stats you could definitely make cases for Samuels or Roach I suppose but they mainly did their damages against Bangladesh's bowlers and New Zealand's batsmen respectively which puts it into context a bit.
~ Cribbage
1. Alistair Cook
2. Graeme Smith
3. Hashim Amla
4. Jacques Kallis/Marlon Samuels
5. Michael Clarke
6. Shivnarine Chanderpaul
7. Matt Prior+
8. Vernon Philander
9. Peter Siddle
10. Kemar Roach/Herath
11. Saeed Ajmal
With the caveat that we only pick on 2012 performances this is easy.
Cook
Smith
Amla
Kallis
Clarke
Hussey
Prior
Philander or Herath if it's turning
Steyn
Ajmal
Anderson
I know Herath's taken ****loads of poles at ****-all but Ajmal has been clearly the best spinner this year IMO. Just hasn't played that many Tests. Anderson's actually been a bit below-part for much of the year but saves himself by his work in India which was top class.
And as good as Chanders has been, so has Hussey and he's a much, much better #6 than Chanders or really anyone else you care to name. I'm not picking Chanders at 6, sorry. 5 or above, fine, but those spots are taken and Chanders would be a really, really poor #6 IMO.
+ time's fickle card game ~ with you and i +
chanders puffed himself up against bangers
someone needs to call me out over my warner selection, but he's scored only a smidge less runs than smith, played a couple of blinders, and fits in the lineup well too imo. smith would also be a destabilising force in the changeroom, he'd never handle clarkeh's aggressive and innovative captaincy
Would select Ian Bell to play at short leg
otherwise fine
Maybe we wouldn't be so quick to fill buckets with filth if we knew they had a soul. Or maybe that's what they're into. Ain't no way to get inside a bucket's mind.
look if you want to pick a comedy XI start a new thread
Howe_zat got told!
I think Chanderpaul often loses out in exercises like this because he has the technique of a number 6 but the temperament of a number 3. He bats five for the West Indies as a matter of choice so you'd think he'd make a perfectly good six, but in reality he'd probably get stranded quite a bit.
Yeah that's the thing. You wouldn't get anything like the output you'd expect (even if his stats look awesome) because he keeps getting stuck. Don't think he'd work brilliantly with the tail either, as opposed to Muss who'd squeeze every last run out of the lower order.
How did Chanders go against Australia again this year? Can't remember.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)