Simpson^ | Hayden | Bradman | Chappell^ | Ponting | Border* | Gilchrist+ | Davidson3 | Warne4^ | Lillee1 | McGrath2
Greenidge | Hunte | Richards^ | Headley* | Lara^ | Sobers5^ | Walcott+ | Marshall1 | Ambrose2 | Holding3 | Garner4
Richards^ | Smith*^ | Amla | Pollock | Kallis5^ | Nourse | Cameron+ | Procter3 | Steyn1 | Tayfield4 | Donald2
Hobbs | Hutton*^ | Hammond^ | Compton | Barrington | Botham5^ | Knott | Trueman1 | Laker4 | Larwood2 | Barnes3
Oh for a strong arm and a walking stick
This one is pretty clear cut
Donald - 22
Steyn - 13
Pollock - 3
Procter - 3
Adcock - 2
LeRoux - 1
Team so far:
Kindly choose one of the below players or one of your choosing
A.B de Villiers
Batting order can be adjusted based on this selection
This is a very tough one.
So much depends on the balance of the side. I'm tempted to go with Faulkner and play 4 specialist quicks.
Very simple one for me.
Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09
Rejecting 'selection deontology' since Mar '15
'Stats' is not a synonym for 'Career Test Averages'
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Tucker
Great champion of the old 'uns that I usually am I do think Faulkner is a tad over-rated round these parts - through no fault of his own he only played 12 of his 25 Tests against full strength opposition so, fine player that he undoubtedly was, I'm going to go for Mike Procter again - best all rounder the game has seen, through my rose-tinted glasses anyway
Procter was a top class batsman - you don't get six consecutive first class centuries by being a fast bowler with a good eye - he was quality
I see Kallis as the second best ever all rounder and good enough for that role. Deciding btwn Taylor and Amla.
Aubrey Faulkner is the obvious choice.
That way we get 3 x quicks, 1 x offie, and a highly competent leg-break googly bowler in the side to secure the ultimate bowling attack.
And with Waite and Procter to follow it doesn't matter too much that Faulkner is probably not as good as Amla et al.
I'm not arguing with you, I'm just explaining why I am right.
you can just vote for procter next round can't you
Brad McNamara @bbuzzmc
Will say this once and then nothing else. Defamation laws quite clear in Aus.be careful.
What a ****ing ridiculously OP batting line up/deep bowling line-up if what I'm envisaging goes through.
Both Procter and Pollock should play, really.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)