Brad McNamara @bbuzzmc
Will say this once and then nothing else. Defamation laws quite clear in Aus.be careful.
Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09
I think the difference between Proctor and Tayfield is smaller than the difference between Holding and Gibbs though.
RIP Craig Walsh (Craig) 1985-2012
Proudly supporting the #2 cricketer of all time.
Steyn: Matches = 11 Ave = 27.28 SR = 46.0
S.Pollock: Matches = 13 Ave = 36.85 SR = 80.8
Adcock: Matches = 5 Ave = 29.28 SR = 74.8
P.Pollock: Matches = 14 Ave = 27.65 SR = 57.0
Procter: Matches = 7 Ave = 15.02 SR = 36.9
Actually you're right Satan, Donald's figures aren't flash. But they still significantly better than Shaun Pollock who is rank last.
The surprise package is Peter Pollock. On those numbers he deserves more votes than he is getting!
And we also can draw a reasonable conclusion from those 7 Test matches of Mike Procter. That is, he must have been one hell of a fast bowler.
Last edited by watson; 14-12-2012 at 01:53 AM.
Fred Spofforth, 'The Demon Speaks'The figures Sir Home Hordon has shown me of what Grace did in matches against me, 37 innings, 1042 runs, 28.16 average, considerably less than his general average, hears out my theory that I never had any particular difficulty in getting him out. I clean bowled him seven times, ACM Croome says that WG told him that on any wicket he never knew when I should bowl him. This may have been due in part to my artfulness......
Both Pollock and Procter should make it but I'm trying not to over-think it and just pick who I think are the best two pacers.
I want Procter in the side too, and I will have him ahead of Shaun Pollock as first change.
~ Do you think I care for you so little that betraying me would make a difference ~
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)