|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Cricket Web Staff Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: high dudgeon
Posts: 9,725
|
Comparing the great fielders
I've just read an interesting article in the latest edition of "The Cricket Statistician". I enjoyed it not only because it's interesting, but also because it makes me realise my life is nowhere near as empty as that of its author, Charles Davis, who must have spent an incredible number of hours going back through cricket history trying to find out the fielder responsible for each and every run out in every single Test match ever played. He has managed to succeed in 91% of all cases, 93% since 1945, and every single one since 1995. He has then gone on to produce a table that produces a total as well as a rate of run outs per ten Tests. The results astonished me
Top total belongs to none other than Jack Hobbs, with 19. He also averages 3.11 per 10 Tests, much the highest of those with at least 10 run outs to their credit, with one exception, that exception being Chris Harris of New Zealand whose 11 came at thr remarkable rate of 4.78 per 10 Tests To put that in context the only other man with ten or more who got more than half of Hobbs' average was Brian Statham with 1.57 In Hobbs time run outs accounted for between 4 and 5 % of dismissals, as opposed to around 3% this century, but it does still demonstrate that Hobbs must have a top class act in the covers |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
International Debutant
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: w.i
Posts: 2,505
|
Good stuff, was it only run outs or did the article speak to cathes as well?
__________________
1st XI Hutton | Hobbs | Bradman | Richards | Tendulkar | Sobers | Gilchrist | Khan | Marshall | Warne | McGrath 2nd XI Sutcliffe | Gavaskar | Headley | Chappell | Lara | Kallis | Miller | Knott | Ambrose | Lillee | Muralitharan 3rd XI Greenidge | Morris | Ponting | Pollock | Hammond | Worrell | Ames | Hadlee | Holding | Trueman | O'Reilly 4th XI Richards | Simpson | Sangakkara | Weekes | Border | Walcott | Botham | Lindwall | Laker | Garner | Barnes |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Cricket Web Staff Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Medway valley
Posts: 5,269
|
Hobbs, and Bradman not long after, were known to be excellent cover fieldsmen in an age when few bothered to make much of an effort in the field. I assume that Davis went through a number of archived newspaper reports as the fielders responsible for run-outs have only been credited in the last 10 years or so, and even in Wisden were not always mentioned, especially in Tests played outside England.
Last edited by stumpski; 08-12-2012 at 02:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Cricket Web Staff Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Medway valley
Posts: 5,269
|
I would be interested to know where the likes of Rhodes, Bland and Randall come in btw.
And, I know it wasn't a Test but didn't Viv Richards run out three batsmen in the '75 World Cup final? Perhaps the greatest impact on a one-day match by someone who made no impact with bat or ball. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Cricket Web Staff Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: high dudgeon
Posts: 9,725
|
Sadly I don't think you can - you'd have to subscribe to it
Quote:
Bland had less than 10, but his average was 3.33, so better than Hobbs. Bradman had 9 and his average 1.73 One really odd one was that Boycott's was better than Gower's - both averaged about 0.9, but Boycs just a touch more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
International Coach
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hanging on !
Posts: 11,292
|
Quote:
__________________
Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes. Walt Whitman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,100
|
Interesting exercise. The nature of run outs though makes me feel they can't be expressed statistically; in some ways it discriminates against fieldsmen who had such a reputation that you daren't leave your crease when it went anywhere near them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
International Coach
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hanging on !
Posts: 11,292
|
Quote:
I know this is just from wiki, but isn't this just the coolest pic of the master and Sutcliffe ![]() ![]() Any Aussies seen it for real? That my friends is how you do an Empire... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
International Captain
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Colombo, SL
Posts: 5,175
|
Running must have been ****, to help the course
__________________
Diuretics are used to look good at TV shows I played for 20 years in the Lankan team, I did not have any problems as a Tamil - Muralidaran Last edited by Migara; 08-12-2012 at 08:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vote 1 Tangy
Posts: 30,097
|
Interesting exchange.
__________________
Parmi | #1 draft pick | Jake King is **** | PM me for my list of CW posters you shouldn't talk cricket with in Cricket Chat Come and Paint Turtle
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VVS Laxman - Truly Great or Truly Ordinary | cricketingminds | Cricket Chat | 25 | 05-02-2012 06:57 AM |
| Does Virender Sehwag deserve to be called an ALL TIME GREAT? | HeavyBall | Cricket Chat | 92 | 28-01-2012 11:14 PM |
| A Tribute to a Great Englishman | fredfertang | Cricket Chat | 7 | 06-03-2011 06:08 AM |