LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reckon de Kock is a bit of a Kock irl. Looks like the stereotypical annoying, big-talk keeper.
Reckon de Kock is a bit of a Kock irl. Looks like the stereotypical annoying, big-talk keeper.
@CowsCorner - 151 followers and counting!
Check out the blog too: http://cowscorner.wordpress.com
Latest Blog post: Kallis – The Unsung Hero (Inspired by a debate right here on cricketweb!)
Think you're looking at his T20 stats.Originally Posted by MrPrez
Yep.
ABCDeV, Faf & Duminy all have those stocky frames that have the potential to pie out in later life too.
- As featured in The Independent.
"This is not the time for namby-pamby promising youngsters who might just do something; not the time for building for the future. Pragmatism rules and they don't come more pragmatic than Rogers."
- Victor Marks makes the case for stiff-legged and stiff-armed 35 year old left-handers in Ashes squads
From this series, we definitely need an attacking opener to take the game to the opposition new-ball bowlers. Ryder or McCullum. I would lean towards Ryder, because McCullum might think that he needs to build an innings, being the captain and all.
Anyway, sick of seeing us 40/2 after 14 overs. Rather us be 70/2 with the attacking opener(s) doing their job, even if they get out doing it.
Greatest Ever Test XI (according to my ratings): Hobbs, Hutton, Bradman (c), Headley, Lara, Sobers, Gilchrist (wk), Hadlee, Marshall, Steyn, Muralitharan 12th man: Imran Khan
Favorite XI: Grace (c), Trumper, Richards, Lara, Compton, Gilchrist (wk), Cairns, Jessop, Warne, Bond, Trueman
Elgar's stocky as well. Morkel's a stick insect though and Steyn is slight.
In all fairness I don't think anyone would argue scoring more runs for the loss of the same number of wickets is ever a bad thing.
Ugh. Leading edge on the drive as I type from Watling.
McCullum goes.
Time for bed.
Right, another match where we stutter, fart, and **** our way to 210/9, which the opposition knock off in 40 overs. **** this **** and **** McCullum. **** shot. **** strategy. 60 runs on the board after 20 overs in this day and age. **** me. You'd need to score at 6 an over to get 240 from there, which is just about adequate. I don't understand the thinking behind this. Surely they can't think the middle order can whack 90 off the last 10 every single game?
EDIT: would have been the same thing in game 2 had Williamson not played a blinder with support from Elliott.
Last edited by Days of Grace; 25-01-2013 at 07:08 AM.
It' was labelled list A but it's SA tv so fair chance it's wrong.
Looks a decent LO bowler though.
Munro still around. Surprising the umpire can get it that wrong.
Munro needs to stick around for the LOLs. I wanna see how village he really is.
It's a myth that batsmen always know wether they've hit it or not.
100 dot balls and 7 fours in 24 overs. Says it all.
Just tuned in, will be the first time watching Munro. Hope he lives up to the CW description of him.
Open net for the fringe selections, babeh. Someone told these guys Zinzan's stat about winning the next seven and still being ranked seventh.
Just requests (or incredible play from Weerasundara etc.) will now hit Plunket Promise. Or access the vault from here.
Poor Shunt. Has he done enough.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
