Same as everyone else. Rahul Dravid
No-brainer. Dravid it is.
I am going with Dravid as well for the number of test matches he has won for India and the obvious..almost went for Amarnath as well..Dravid for all his record was not that good in bouncy pitches with real pace (btw Dravid was a master against swing bowling) ..Amarnath was a great player of pace if not for that one horrendous series he is a legitimate threat to Dravid's position in the India ATG X1..If bounce and pace i will pick Amarnath and if there is swing then Dravid ..
CricZo XI - Draft Dashboard
7 Golds | 13 Silvers
Scorecard Draft - 2010 | Alphabetical Draft - 2011 | The Eras Draft - 2014 | All Time Australia Draft - 2016 | All England Draft - 2016 | Draft By Nation - 2016 | All-time Trading Game - 2016
Oh, and Dravid for no.3.
While we're at it, Tendulkar at no.4.
Surely these two are both locks and we can move on?
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW
Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta
If the fifth bowler offered nothing with the bat then that's one thing, but when the fifth world class bowler also contributes more than usefully as a batsman then it's a no-brainer for me. I realise that the modern cricket fan tends to disagree with that and would happily sacrifice the fifth bowler completely in order to have an extra specialist batsman, but I don't necessarily hold with that way of thinking.
The number 3 is settled.
Pick THREE out of the following(or add your own) and post in order you would want them in the team, that is number 4, 5 and 6.
Inzamam Ul Haq
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)