Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09
Rejecting 'selection deontology' since Mar '15
'Stats' is not a synonym for 'Career Test Averages'
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Tucker
This is textbook trolling and its working hook, line and sinker.
The guy posted a link to an article from January 2010 ffs.
As if you've ever read a textbook.
Everyone knows the extent to which they dominated but India dominated too for some time although not to that level.
Also saying Indian people don't have access to a gym early on hence why lack of emphasis on fitness is rubbish. Once you are cricketer you have the money in India to do what you want-get all sorts of coaches and trainers. It's more a cultural thing then lack of access. Also our players are so talented they haven't really had to work at something so much.
I still maintain gym fitness is different to match fitness as Gavasker once pointed out too. I would rather have Indian players catching safely and spending many hours in the nets than working directly on fitness. If we had a limited talent pool then the Andy Flower approch would be crucial.
No your point is ****. Sehwag is not Bradman.
oh dear god
do you think people will be allowed to make violins?
who's going to make the violins?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)