|
|
#691 (permalink) |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 37,702
|
LAW 18.3 - Short runs
(a) A run is short if a batsman fails to make good his ground in turning for a further run. (b) Although a short run shortens the succeeding one, the latter if completed shall not be regarded as short. A striker setting off for his first run from in front of his popping crease may do so also without penalty. They ran back for two, so it should've counted for one. Terrible umpiring.
__________________
~ Cribbage
|
|
|
|
|
|
#692 (permalink) |
|
Hall of Fame Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: dxb
Posts: 18,855
|
haha.....a comedy of errors towards the end
well played bangers
__________________
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta |
|
|
|
|
|
#693 (permalink) |
|
International Regular
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Essex
Posts: 3,575
|
Congrats to the Deshis, long time coming for them and their loyal fans deserve some success.
__________________
Batsman I tolerate: V. Richards, S. Tendulkar, E. Morgan, N. Hussain. KEVIN O F******* BRIEN |
|
|
|
|
|
#696 (permalink) |
|
First Class Debutant
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 880
|
Nasiir had hit the ball with 1 to win, it want past the infield, and he and Sunny went off celebrating.
But then someone fetched the ball and said it didn't go for a four, and Sunny and Nasir didn't cross properly, and so the run didn't count. Sammy, Gayle and a few others argued with the umps, so saw a replay, and decided that indeed no run was scored, and so the next ball had to be boweld |
|
|
|
|
|
#699 (permalink) |
|
First Class Debutant
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 880
|
BD needed 1 run to win in 39 balls when the shot was hit, with 2 wickets in hand. It was easily a single, even two, Gazi almost reached the crease before he just turned around and went and joined the celebration.
Everyone was running around celebrating and then Sammy and co, went and ruined the mood to argue that the run shouldn't count and got them to not count the run and make them bowl one more ball. It was pointless and needless and in bad spirit. No point whatsoever to do it. They spent more time arguing for the run to not be counted than it took the ball right after that to be bowled, which promptly got hit for 4, and made no difference. Just being an annoying buzzkill. Bad taste. Dick move. |
|
|
|
|
|
#700 (permalink) | |
|
International Regular
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Essex
Posts: 3,575
|
Quote:
Academic now though |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#701 (permalink) |
|
International Debutant
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New Zealand doom and gloom thread
Posts: 2,319
|
Bangaz
Finally pushing Mahmudullah up. Result.Nasir should bat down the order where he's good at. Mahmudullah should come at 3 or at worst 4. When Shakib's back: |
|
|
|
|
|
#703 (permalink) |
|
First Class Debutant
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 880
|
Definitely within your rights, but in very poor taste and spirit. It's not like that run was the biggest factor in deciding the result of the game, so much so you had to get in cancelled. Top order failed, support bowlers failed, sloppy fielding, all lead to WI's loss. BD were the better team on the day. Should have just let them have their run and have their moment. Dick move to make them do it again. As if there was actually a realistic chance for them to win if that one run was cancelled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#704 (permalink) | |
|
International Regular
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Essex
Posts: 3,575
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#705 (permalink) |
|
First Class Debutant
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 880
|
Agree to disagree then. I personally find such behaviour childish and as bad sportsmanship.
If there was a realistic chance of reversing the result by having that run cancelled (like if it happened in the last over of the match, or with 1 wicket left and 2 absolute tailenders on strike), then I'd understand. But not in this case. |
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **Official** Road to New Zealand in the West Indies 2012 | Flem274* | Cricket Chat | 175 | 29-05-2012 09:07 PM |
| *Official* South Africa in West Indies | James | Cricket Chat | 1175 | 04-07-2010 06:37 PM |
| *** Official*** Bangladesh in 2010 | cricman | Cricket Chat | 3 | 16-12-2009 02:51 AM |