Indians can't bowl - Where has the rumour come from as I myself and many indian friends arwe competent fast bowlers ?
With the English bid I said: Let us be brief. If you give back the Falkland Islands, which belong to us, you will get my vote. They then became sad and left
Parmi | #1 draft pick | Jake King is **** | Big Bash League tipping champion of the universeCome and Paint Turtle
I don't understand how a big, strong cricketer like John Hastings can't even manage to get it above 130km/h when bowling.
Our best is good but when we are down we are horrible. Can't build pressure on the batsmen and SA are taking full toll.
Poor work by the selectors. Perhaps another review? Or we can invite India back.
Gotta have the obligatory one short, wide nut per over. Terrific execution of the plan.
****s. ****ing abject ****s.
So at what point will SA declare? They could bat Australia out of the game with a target of say 700 while still giving themselves 5 sessions to bowl them out.
Or they could declare late today with a target of around 600, which is makeable in two days though obviously highly unlikely.
That's a beautiful late cut by de Villiers.
Brett Lee: value for money at the WACA...
An hour before lunch tomorrow has been my feeling for a while. No third new ball on offer, but really South Africa shouldn't need a third new ball.
"The Australian cricket captain is the Prime Minister Australia wishes it had. Steve Waugh is that man, Michael Clarke is not." - Jarrod Kimber
RIP Fardin Qayyumi and Craig Walsh - true icons of CricketWeb.
SA don't need to bat for too much longer tbh. 500 - 600 would be a world record chase, and if Australia can manage it after their first innings shambles against a good attack then well played. 700 is excessive. You want Australia to have to bat for as long as possible.
650 or whatever seems a nice target
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)