• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** England in India

hazsa19

International Regular
I was talking to Spark about it a few overs ago and said no at the time, but I'd almost be tempted to take it and just keep Swann on anyway.
Yuvraj looks like a gonner against Swann so I wouldn't want to change anything, but I hope Swann is given the new ball as and when it is taken.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I was talking to Spark about it a few overs ago and said no at the time, but I'd almost be tempted to take it and just keep Swann on anyway.
Don't think there's any point in that, the new ball hardly swung today morning and changing to a new hard ball would just mean it'd come on the bat nicely for Pujara and Yuvraj. Yuvraj especially is looking pretty uncomfortable out there against the turn so I wouldn't want to change anything.

If they don't get another breakthrough soon then it may be worth letting Anderson have a go with the new ball for a couple of overs before stumps but I personally would stick with this one till tomorrow.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Yuvraj looks like a gonner against Swann so I wouldn't want to change anything, but I hope Swann is given the new ball as and when it is taken.
Regardless of whether the new ball is taken or not, I don't think bowling Patel to Yuvraj early in his innings is really the best plan.
 

hazsa19

International Regular
Regardless of whether the new ball is taken or not, I don't think bowling Patel to Yuvraj early in his innings is really the best plan.
Tbf he's looked more threatening in this spell

edit- threatening's probably not the word. He's maintained the pressure at the other end, which is more than the seamers managed.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
First time I've seen Patel play and he doesn't seem much. Does he offer anything?
He's a batsman basically - and realistically, probably not a Test standard one. It's probably harsh to judge him too much on his bowling because even in the context of this side he's been picked as a batsman first, but he's not up to the bowling role that he's been given IMO and England have a couple of better specialist batsmen available.

He's a decent limited overs bowling option because he bowls that full length that just gets driven for singles and is hard to really get under, but he's bowled that same length here for the mostpart and it's entirely toothless in four+ day cricket, as his FC record will testify to. His second spell has actually been a bit quite a bit better in terms of length but he's not really putting anything on the ball in terms of either side spin or overspin. The more I watch him bowl in Test cricket, the more I'm convinced he's a essentially a batsman only in this format unless he makes some serious changes.
 

Top