Page 369 of 675 FirstFirst ... 269319359367368369370371379419469 ... LastLast
Results 5,521 to 5,535 of 10122

Thread: ***Official*** England in India

  1. #5521
    Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator Neil Pickup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    26,857
    Actually, the decision is correct under the playing conditions.

    APPENDIX 4 - SECTION 3.1
    c) The third umpire has to determine whether the batsman has been caught. However, when reviewing the television replay(s), if it is clear to the third umpire that the batsman did not hit the ball, he shall indicate that the batsman is not out

    http://static.icc-cricket.com/ugc/do...203813_266.pdf
    MSN Messenger: minardineil2000 at hotmail dot com | AAAS Chairman
    CricketWeb Black | CricketWeb XI Captain
    ClarkeWatch: We're Watching Rikki - Are You?

    Up The Grecians - Exeter City FC

    Completing the Square: My Cricket Web Blog

  2. #5522
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    43,836
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyZaltzHair View Post
    Rod Tucker has got a lot of answering to do
    He's the one who gave Compton not out before changing his mind and giving him lbw after he's completed a run too. Weird Test from him.
    ~ Cribbertarian ~

    Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since December 2009

  3. #5523
    Hall of Fame Member Jamee999's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Leicestershire, UK
    Posts
    15,094
    Adam Mountford ‏@tmsproducer
    In non DRS match regulations allow for umpires to ask if ball was hit even if they are only checking for a low catch. But he's out anyway!
    Or something.

    RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990 - 15/4/2006

  4. #5524
    Hall of Fame Member Howe_zat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Top floor, bottom buzzer
    Posts
    16,510
    Quote Originally Posted by Neil Pickup View Post
    Actually, the decision is correct under the playing conditions.

    APPENDIX 4 - SECTION 3.1
    c) The third umpire has to determine whether the batsman has been caught. However, when reviewing the television replay(s), if it is clear to the third umpire that the batsman did not hit the ball, he shall indicate that the batsman is not out

    http://static.icc-cricket.com/ugc/do...203813_266.pdf
    Ah, fair play in that case then.


  5. #5525
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    43,836
    Quote Originally Posted by Neil Pickup View Post
    Actually, the decision is correct under the playing conditions.

    APPENDIX 4 - SECTION 3.1
    c) The third umpire has to determine whether the batsman has been caught. However, when reviewing the television replay(s), if it is clear to the third umpire that the batsman did not hit the ball, he shall indicate that the batsman is not out

    http://static.icc-cricket.com/ugc/do...203813_266.pdf
    That's an absolutely ridiculous rule. So you're only allowed to check the edge if a fielder takes a catch near the ground?

    If I was an umpire I'd be "checking to see if the fielder caught it" whenever I wasn't 100% on an edge, even if he took in the chest.

  6. #5526
    Cricket Web Staff Member stumpski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Medway valley
    Posts
    5,819
    I'd have settled for 3 wickets in the session btw, any more willl be a bonus. Just want to see SRT make a few now.

    With Sehwag there India would likely have been ahead by tea.
    Last edited by stumpski; 08-12-2012 at 12:05 AM.

  7. #5527
    International Coach flibbertyjibber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mrs Miggins pie shop
    Posts
    11,838
    Get Tendulkar before tea and it might be over today.

  8. #5528
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    43,836
    Quote Originally Posted by flibbertyjibber View Post
    Get Tendulkar before tea and it might be over today.
    Haha, best post!

  9. #5529
    Cricketer Of The Year Turbinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    7,558
    Yup, it's over.

  10. #5530
    International Coach
    Suicide Bob Champion!
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not really needed on CW
    Posts
    12,775
    Quote Originally Posted by Neil Pickup View Post
    Actually, the decision is correct under the playing conditions.

    APPENDIX 4 - SECTION 3.1
    c) The third umpire has to determine whether the batsman has been caught. However, when reviewing the television replay(s), if it is clear to the third umpire that the batsman did not hit the ball, he shall indicate that the batsman is not out

    http://static.icc-cricket.com/ugc/do...203813_266.pdf
    No doubt this will now appear on Cricinfo. Those bastards.

  11. #5531
    Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator Neil Pickup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    26,857
    Quote Originally Posted by stumpski View Post
    I'd have settled for 3 wickets in the session btw, any more willl be a bonus. Just want to see SRT make a few now.

    With Sehwad there India would likely have been ahead by tea.
    Er, no. As many wickets as possible as fast as possible.

  12. #5532
    International Coach flibbertyjibber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mrs Miggins pie shop
    Posts
    11,838
    I am not giving you guys the lottery numbers for tonight before you ask.

    What a session for us. Innings win?

  13. #5533
    The Wheel is Forever silentstriker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    37,911
    Yup. That's a bicycle stand lineup alright.
    Quote Originally Posted by KungFu_Kallis View Post
    Peter Siddle top scores in both innings....... Matthew Wade gets out twice in one ball
    "The future light cone of the next Indian fast bowler is exactly the same as the past light cone of the previous one"
    -My beliefs summarized in words much more eloquent than I could come up with

    How the Universe came from nothing

  14. #5534
    Hall of Fame Member Howe_zat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Top floor, bottom buzzer
    Posts
    16,510
    Yesyesyes

  15. #5535
    Cricketer Of The Year Turbinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    7,558
    Seriously Yuvraj, don't even bother, you're useless.



Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. highest 50+ scores, percentage(ODIS)
    By Indusriver in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 18-08-2011, 02:51 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •