Great to see Lindsay Hassett in those aussie sides.![]()
I have always noticed that Hassett is one of the most under rated Australian cricketers by the fans and very highly rated by those he played with and against. I thought this happened only in India where a 'glamour quotient' is attached to cricketers which decides whether they are 'stars' or not and for the common fan in India, only the stars are good cricketers and super stars are Gods.
Will stick the teams in my sig, just two notes.
One reason for me why Warne is a lock for me is that bowling or batting being equal, any eztra quality one has would make the difference, and the fact that Warne was a much better bat aside, much more importantly with Warne not in the first team it forces Tendulkar or someone else equally unaccostomed and unsuited into the cordon.
Greg Chappell is really under rated, in WSC he averaged just about the same as Viv and his test career was just spectacular added to his graceful batting was his useful legspin and he was probably the best second slip of all time. He was to Viv as Lara was to Tendulkar, not that far behind and some thought the better player.
1st XI
Hutton | Hobbs | Bradman | Richards | Tendulkar | Sobers | Gilchrist | Khan | Marshall | Warne | McGrath
2nd XI
Sutcliffe | Gavaskar | Headley | Chappell | Lara | Kallis | Miller | Knott | Ambrose | Lillee | Muralitharan
3rd XI
Greenidge | Morris | Ponting | Pollock | Hammond | Worrell | Ames | Hadlee | Holding | Trueman | O'Reilly
4th XI
Richards | Simpson | Sangakkara | Weekes | Border | Walcott | Botham | Lindwall | Laker | Garner | Barnes
True. I consider Headley the second best number 3. And I consider G.Chappell and Hammond both superior players to Tendulkar (very marginally). So it comes down to a choice between Tendulkar and Worrell. And I'll admit it's more to personal preference than anything to do with skill. I like the idea of Worrell as captain as well.
My third XI would definitely contain Tendulkar. In a few months he might be in my 1st XI. All subjective!
Third XI
- Arthur Morris
- Herb Sutcliffe
- Ricky Ponting
- Sachin Tendulkar
- Victor Trumper
- Jaques Kallis
- Adam Gilchrist
- Michael Holding
- Fred Trueman
- Glenn McGrath
- Clarrie Grimmett
No Murali in any of your top three Monk?
Post Expo 88 Team
1. Mark TAYLOR (c)
2. Matthew HAYDEN
3. Ricky PONTING
4. Mark WAUGH
5. Michael CLARKE
6. Steve WAUGH
7. Adam GILCHRIST +
8. Peter SIDDLE
9. Shane WARNE
10. Jason GILLESPIE
11. Glenn MCGRATH
- Siddle favoured over McDermott, Lee, Hughes, Johnson for his ability to take key wickets.
- Terrific fielding unit and brilliant captain
- This lineup has lost 0 matches as a unit, so its unlikely they would ever lose a Test match.![]()
Last edited by NUFAN; 09-01-2013 at 06:10 PM.
I don't think any opening bat from Australia (that fits the criteria) could have performed the role that Hayden performed as successfully so he is a pretty safe bet for me, as much as I like Boon.
No worries about McDermott, great bowler.
how could you prefer Siddle over McDermott
McDermott was a very good bowler
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW
Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta
Its very easy for me to prefer Sid, but even looking objectively for a minute (and only a minute) there records are almost identical:
Billy
ave 28.63
econ 3.01
sr 56.9
vs
Big Heart
ave 28.51
econ 3.02
sr 56.6
Records aren't the only thing to consider, its team dynamics and since I've already included a terrific opening ball pairing in McGrath and Gillespie I'm happy to select a bowler used to bowling first change like Siddle and I like how often he takes important wickets.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)