Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14-11-2012, 02:24 AM   #1096 (permalink)
International Coach
 
Howe_zat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Top floor, bottom buzzer
Posts: 13,849
Add on Wardle, Blythe and Peel, and Swann just about makes the top 10.
Howe_zat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2012, 02:46 PM   #1097 (permalink)
School Boy/Girl Captain
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 172
Is number 8 a specialist position when picking a ATG team

Having read some of the various all time threads, it appears that the concensus seems to be pick the four best bowlers regardless of the team balance.(eg number of spinners in Eng ATG). In normal teams there is generally an expectation that the no 8 be a specialist bowler that can bat somewhat but does a team with so many great batsman need a no 8 that can bat.

Maybe we can nominate the list of best no 8 for ATG teams regardless of what other choices would be made.

For instance, who is Australia's greatest.

Given Miller is almost always placed at 6 and given reduced bowling duties, that for me means that Davidson would be Australia's best choice at number 8. a line up of say

6 Miller
7 Gilchrist
8 Davidson

Would be aggresive, entertaining and be able to flog wearied attacks exhausted from having worked through the top order.

For the Windies, Malcolm Marshall comes to my mind as their best number 8.
For NZ, Vettori

So who would be the best number 8 (specailist bowler who can bat a bit) in the each countries line up (regardless of whether they made the actual ATG team)?

Last edited by Malleeboy; 15-11-2012 at 02:55 PM.
Malleeboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2012, 03:57 PM   #1098 (permalink)
International Regular
 
Days of Grace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Takasaki, Japan
Posts: 3,854
For New Zealand, maybe Hadlee, since Cairns would probably be at no.7. Depends if you think Vettori is better than Hadlee. Since Dan's recent downturn in form, I call it even.
__________________
Greatest Ever Test XI (according to my ratings): Hobbs, Hutton, Bradman (c), Headley, Lara, Sobers, Gilchrist (wk), Hadlee, Marshall, Steyn, Muralitharan 12th man: Imran Khan


Favorite XI: Grace (c), Trumper, Richards, Lara, Compton, Gilchrist (wk), Cairns, Jessop, Warne, Bond, Trueman
Days of Grace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2012, 04:07 PM   #1099 (permalink)
Dan
Global Moderator
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jager View Post
Where does Swann rate out of all the English spinners? Rankings would be great
If I were to rank English spinners, it would look something like this:

1. Verity
2. Laker
3. Underwood
4. Briggs
5. Wardle
6. Peel
7. Blythe
8. Rhodes
9. Swann
10. Lock
...
99. Ashley Giles
Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2012, 04:24 PM   #1100 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
kyear2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: w.i
Posts: 2,502
Ray Lindwall, Shane Warne or Allan Davidson could do the job for Australia
Shaun Polock or Mike Procter for South Africa
Hedley Verity would also be capable of doing the job for England
__________________
1st XI
Hutton | Hobbs | Bradman | Richards | Tendulkar | Sobers | Gilchrist | Khan | Marshall | Warne | McGrath
2nd XI
Sutcliffe | Gavaskar | Headley | Chappell | Lara | Kallis | Miller | Knott | Ambrose | Lillee | Muralitharan
3rd XI
Greenidge | Morris | Ponting | Pollock | Hammond | Worrell | Ames | Hadlee | Holding | Trueman | O'Reilly
4th XI
Richards | Simpson | Sangakkara | Weekes | Border | Walcott | Botham | Lindwall | Laker | Garner | Barnes
kyear2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2012, 04:38 PM   #1101 (permalink)
International Regular
 
Mike5181's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: City of Sails
Posts: 3,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by Days of Grace View Post
For New Zealand, maybe Hadlee, since Cairns would probably be at no.7. Depends if you think Vettori is better than Hadlee. Since Dan's recent downturn in form, I call it even.
Vettori is probably the best number 8 of all-time. He averages like 40 there, I think.
Mike5181 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2012, 06:29 PM   #1102 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
Monk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,570
I'll repeat some already mentioned but ideal guys (can bat a bit, and have a bit of a dip) for number 8 could be....

Australia- Lindwall, Davidson, Benaud a few of the keepers like Healy/Marsh, Warne. Guys like Lee and Gillepsie were capable up the order at times.

South Africa- Shaun Pollock, Procter

WIs- Marshall

Eng- Verity. Knott if Botham was at 7. Botham if Ames was at 7.

Pak- Wasim Akram (ideal imo)

India- Kapil could go that low, as he's their first picked quick. Kirmani/Engineer (if Kapil was at 7)

NZ- Vettori and Hadlee.
Monk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2012, 09:19 PM   #1103 (permalink)
International Coach
 
NUFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NSW
Posts: 13,742
If I had to pick a current XI playing on a pitch offering something for the bowlers I would go for the following team:

1..Alastair Cook
2. Graeme Smith
3. Hashim Amla
4. Jacques Kallis
5. Michael Clarke
6. Kumar Sangakarra
7. Matt Prior
8. Vernon Philander
9. Dale Steyn
10. Saeed Ajmal
11. James Anderson


Shiv Chanderpaul would be my batting reserve.
NUFAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2012, 09:40 PM   #1104 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
watson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike5181 View Post
Vettori is probably the best number 8 of all-time. He averages like 40 there, I think.
You're right. Vettori is the most successful No.8 batsman (minimum 1000 runs) of all time. Average 42.29

It Figures | Cricket Blogs | ESPN Cricinfo
__________________
1945-1977 ATG Draft: Desmond Haynes - Roy Fredericks - Rohan Kanhai - Neil Harvey - Clive Lloyd - Asif Iqbal - John Waite - Ray Lindwall - Garth McKenzie - John Snow - Derek Underwood

ATG XI: Jack Hobbs - Len Hutton - Don Bradman - Brian Lara - Graham Pollock - Gary Sobers - Alan Knott - Malcolm Marshall - Shane Warne - Dennis Lillee- Sydney Barnes
watson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-11-2012, 09:53 PM   #1105 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
watson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monk View Post
I'll repeat some already mentioned but ideal guys (can bat a bit, and have a bit of a dip) for number 8 could be....

Australia- Lindwall, Davidson, Benaud a few of the keepers like Healy/Marsh, Warne. Guys like Lee and Gillepsie were capable up the order at times.

South Africa- Shaun Pollock, Procter

WIs- Marshall

Eng- Verity. Knott if Botham was at 7. Botham if Ames was at 7.

Pak- Wasim Akram (ideal imo)

India- Kapil could go that low, as he's their first picked quick. Kirmani/Engineer (if Kapil was at 7)

NZ- Vettori and Hadlee.
Alan Knott is the third most successful No.7 of all time (minimum 1500 runs) behind Adam Gilchrist and Chris Cairns.

It Figures | Cricket Blogs | ESPN Cricinfo

I think that Botham and Ames fail to feature in this study because they didn't score the mandatory 1500 runs at No.7 to qualify.

However, Botham did score 2690 runs at No.6 with a moderately crappy average of 29.23. Chanderpaul is ranked highest with an average of 65.74.

Last edited by watson; 15-11-2012 at 10:20 PM.
watson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2012, 02:18 AM   #1106 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
Flem274*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Jeets' sheets
Posts: 23,370
Hobbs
Grace
Bradman
Tendulkar
Sobers
Kallis
Gilchrist (wk)
Miller
Imran (c)
Hadlee
Warne

That number four position could have gone to one of many. Warne edges out Murali based on batting and fielding. In other news I really rate allrounders.

If I wanted to make a side to face another world eleven, then knowing I'd be faced with some West Indian quicks, McGrath, Murali, Hammond, Lara, Ponting etc I'd like to bat down to 10 with allrounders and have about 10,000 bowling options including four ATG bowlers. I'd back the relative lack of batting and bowling depth in the other side to be their downfall because my team just keeps going.
__________________
Direbirds FTL!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Athlai
Wellington will win the whole thing next year. Mark my words.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flem274*
I'll offer up my avatar to Athlai forever if Wellington wins the Champions League.
President of T.I.T.S
Tamim Isn't Talented Society


Proudly supporting Central Districts
RIP Craig Walsh
Flem274* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2012, 04:43 AM   #1107 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
bagapath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: India
Posts: 4,621
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flem274* View Post
Hobbs
Grace
Bradman
Tendulkar
Sobers
Kallis
Gilchrist (wk)
Miller
Imran (c)
Hadlee
Warne

I'd back the relative lack of batting and bowling depth in the other side to be their downfall because my team just keeps going.

hutton
gavaskar
headley
hammond
viv richards
a.flower (wk)
faulkner
pollock
benaud
akram
davidson
bagapath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2012, 03:44 PM   #1108 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: The land of Siddle
Posts: 2,876
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvd619323 View Post
If I were to rank English spinners, it would look something like this:

1. Verity
2. Laker
3. Underwood
4. Briggs
5. Wardle
6. Peel
7. Blythe
8. Rhodes
9. Swann
10. Lock
...
99. Ashley Giles
Personally I'd put Swann right up there, probably in fourth at the moment for me.
__________________
Oh for a strong arm and a walking stick
Jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2012, 04:17 PM   #1109 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
watson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvd619323 View Post
If I were to rank English spinners, it would look something like this:

1. Verity
2. Laker
3. Underwood
4. Briggs
5. Wardle
6. Peel
7. Blythe
8. Rhodes
9. Swann
10. Lock
...
99. Ashley Giles
Wilfred Rhodes is problematic because he more-or-less gave up bowling during 1909 to take up opening the innings with Jack Hobbs. But prior to that he was a superb spin bowler and rated very highly by no-less than Victor Trumper.

I think that he deserves to be higher than No.8. Perhaps 4-6.
watson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2012, 04:40 PM   #1110 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
Monk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flem274* View Post
Hobbs
Grace
Bradman
Tendulkar
Sobers
Kallis
Gilchrist (wk)
Miller
Imran (c)
Hadlee
Warne

Good XI. We'll take you on..


Sutcliffe
Gavaskar
Headley
Pollock
Hammond
Lara
Knott
Wasim
Marshall
Ambrose
Murali
Monk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thread Hijacks sledger Site Discussion 90 10-02-2010 04:32 PM
Sri Lanka Thread chaminda_00 2009 ICC World Twenty20 7 05-05-2009 05:29 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web