Devillier has the ability to show ball the right path, there are two ways to do so, 1. form where the ball is coming, 2 where the ball is going to
Amla can just hit the ball harder with the use of timing and strock
Devilliers is younger so he will learn with the passage of time
Devilliers plays in all the situations and conditons while all amla is a powerplay player
So Devillieris can be said as better
Big can of worms here:
Sachin Tendulkar | India Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | ESPN Cricinfo
Ricky Ponting | Australia Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | ESPN Cricinfo
Jacques Kallis | South Africa Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | ESPN Cricinfo
Brian Lara | West Indies Cricket | Cricket Players and Officials | ESPN Cricinfo
Is SRT really the best of the 4, and Kallis the worst given the stats?
@CowsCorner - 202 followers and counting!
Disclaimer: I am a biased South African. Anything I say is likely to have something in it that ultimately favours the Proteas.
Lara > Tendulkar > Ponting > Kallis for mine and I don't give a **** about the stats.
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!
Anyone want to join the Society?
Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
If you're talking about entertainment value, I agree.
You're not, though. I find the double standards with regards to the judging of players quite annoying. Kallis may have batted slowly, but it was due to his role in the team. He performed his role just as well as any of the others (statistically, better) and to judge him on his SR in Tests is ludicrous at the best of times.
Let's be honest - Kallis doesn't get rated as highly due to the fact that he was deemed "selfish" due to his slow nature. He was in fact the opposite of selfish - he took up the mantra for the good of the team! He has shown, at times, that he can attack as well as any of the aforementioned; the aforementioned just had aggression more integrated with their role in the team.
No, I'm talking about who I think was the best of the 4 down in order to who I think is the worst - it's based on watching them all over a number of years.
The top three just a touch above the other two though. And yes the ability to dominate an attack and set the tempo for an innings does count or Barrington would be rated higher than Viv.
Last edited by kyear2; 03-10-2012 at 07:45 PM.
Hutton* | Hobbs | Bradman | Richards^ | Tendulkar | Sobers5^ | Gilchrist+ | Khan3 | Marshall1 | Warne4^ | McGrath2
Sutcliffe | Gavaskar* | Headley | Chappell^ | Lara^ | Kallis5^ | Knott+ | Hadlee3 | Ambrose2 | Lillee1 | Muralitharan4
Greenidge | Richards^ | Ponting^ | Pollock | Hammond^ | Worrell5* | Waite+ | Akram3 | Steyn1 | Holding2 | O'Reilly4
Morris | Simpson^ | Sangakkara | Weekes^ | Border*^ | Walcott+ | Faulkner5 | Laker4 | Trueman1 | Garner3 | Donald2
Sachin is only considered the best because 40 trillion Indians with internet are adamant he is. In reality, you can't split them easily.
Last edited by Monk; 03-10-2012 at 10:46 PM.
The idea of this team is to win matches as fast as possible. They can bowl a team out fast and then pile on a huge score quickly.
Oh for a strong arm and a walking stick
in ATG team his tail starts at 7
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW
Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta
Top Ten Batsman
Since I am at it
Top 10 Bowlers
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)