|
|
#286 (permalink) |
|
International Debutant
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: The land of Siddle
Posts: 2,876
|
I considered that, yeah. The way I designed my team was that it has two bowlers to share the fifth bowling spot - Miller will bowl like a hurricane as the first change but after that, Sobers will take over as the ball starts to get very old.
This will allow Miller to primarily focus on his batting and reduce his soreness by a great deal, so I'd predict he'd sway towards being a 45-50 averaging batsman as he's not being dragged down by a heavy workload. Barry Richards would (in my eyes) have averaged 60+ in test cricket, and he would have been a great first drop - he's only there so Hobbs and Sutcliffe can continue their prolific partnership
__________________
Oh for a strong arm and a walking stick |
|
|
|
|
|
#287 (permalink) |
|
International Debutant
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,689
|
???
07. Mike Proctor 08. Don Tallon 09. Malcolm Marshall 10. Shane Warne 11. Bill O'Reilly
__________________
1945-1977 ATG Draft: Desmond Haynes - Roy Fredericks - Rohan Kanhai - Neil Harvey - Clive Lloyd - Asif Iqbal - John Waite - Ray Lindwall - Garth McKenzie - John Snow - Derek Underwood ATG XI: Jack Hobbs - Len Hutton - Don Bradman - Brian Lara - Graham Pollock - Gary Sobers - Alan Knott - Malcolm Marshall - Shane Warne - Dennis Lillee- Sydney Barnes |
|
|
|
|
|
#288 (permalink) |
|
International Debutant
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: The land of Siddle
Posts: 2,876
|
Bloody hell, it's almost too hard.
My list of bowlers who I almost need to have in my first XI (otherwise I feel like there's a gross lack of justice) Fast: Larwood, Marshall, Ambrose, Waqar, Imran, Davidson, Procter Slow: Verity, Warne, O'Reilly |
|
|
|
|
|
#290 (permalink) |
|
International Debutant
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: w.i
Posts: 2,514
|
Miller and Tallon severly weakens your top seven, Barry Richards never batted at three and Sutcliffe isn't even England best #2 opener, that has to go to Hutton who I believe was better. So playing Sutcliffe is like playing Haynes with Greenidge even though Hunte was better. Playing Miller as a joint 5th bowler only makes sense if you are playing two spinners who would not be as effective as three front line pacers.
Looking forward to seeing your full team.
__________________
1st XI Hutton | Hobbs | Bradman | Richards | Tendulkar | Sobers | Gilchrist | Khan | Marshall | Warne | McGrath 2nd XI Sutcliffe | Gavaskar | Headley | Chappell | Lara | Kallis | Miller | Knott | Ambrose | Lillee | Muralitharan 3rd XI Greenidge | Morris | Ponting | Pollock | Hammond | Worrell | Ames | Hadlee | Holding | Trueman | O'Reilly 4th XI Richards | Simpson | Sangakkara | Weekes | Border | Walcott | Botham | Lindwall | Laker | Garner | Barnes |
|
|
|
|
|
#293 (permalink) |
|
International Debutant
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: The land of Siddle
Posts: 2,876
|
Of course they would, but a team isn't just a bunch of individuals, it's a working unit, so Miller as captain and bowling short bursts would be extremely useful. It will allow him to focus on his batting too. Also I think saying that having two spinners is 'less effective' is just plain wrong, especially these days where nearly every batsman is an absolute muppet against spin.
Hobbs and Sutcliffe averaged something like 87 runs per opening stand with near-telepathic running between wickets - can't fault that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#294 (permalink) | |
|
Hall of Fame Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: dxb
Posts: 18,862
|
Quote:
__________________
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#297 (permalink) | |
|
Hall of Fame Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: dxb
Posts: 18,862
|
Quote:
After all Marshall was very outstanding for maybe 6 to 7 years of his career. He started off pretty slowly and wasn't all that flash for the first 5 years of his career or so. And the last 2 years of his career didn't go that well either (comparing to himself of course) so you are looking at somebody like Ponting (to take a batting example) last 2 years Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo first 5 years Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#300 (permalink) | |
|
International Debutant
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,587
|
Quote:
Is your choice of Tallon based purely on the fact that you think he is the best wicketkeeper of all time? Maybe you could go...... 1. Jack Hobbs 2. Herbert Sutcliffe 3. Barry Richards 4. Don Bradman 5. Keith Miller 6. Garfield Sobers 7. Imran or Procter 8. Don Tallon 9. Marshall 10. Warne 11. O'Reilly Imran or Procter at 7 looks better to me than Tallon. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thread Hijacks | sledger | Site Discussion | 90 | 10-02-2010 04:32 PM |
| Sri Lanka Thread | chaminda_00 | 2009 ICC World Twenty20 | 7 | 05-05-2009 05:29 AM |