Spot/Match fixers punished in Indian cricket

[silentstriker]

India news: Full text of BCCI release announcing the bans on five domestic players | India Cricket News | ESPN Cricinfo

 

[intcricket]

As expected, no one think it is something worth commending. Mere mentions of spot fixing on tv.... and boom, life bans, long term bans, all sort of bans.

And what do the other boards do? Shane Warne got a 1 yr off for doing drugs and he was let scot free after his lil "money-job" with Mark Waugh.

 

[Spikey]

uh buddy there's an entire thread about it!

 

[Furball]

As expected, no one think it is something worth commending. Mere mentions of spot fixing on tv.... and boom, life bans, long term bans, all sort of bans.

And what do the other boards do? Shane Warne got a 1 yr off for doing drugs and he was let scot free after his lil "money-job" with Mark Waugh.

A 1/10 effort at best. Lift your game.

 

[fredfertang]

Intcricket must be a wealthy man if he equates an AUS$8000 fine to getting off scot free

 

[doesitmatter]

Intcricket must be a wealthy man if he equates an AUS$8000 fine to getting off scot free

But Warne is . Is he not? unless he spent all his money on lapdance

 

[fredfertang]

But Warne is . Is he not? unless he spent all his money on lapdance

I wouldn't have thought that back in 1995 Warne didn't notice having to part with AUS$8000, although I suppose on reflection what Intcricket might have meant was that when you take into account the US$5000 Warne had been given in the first place that he wasn't really much down on the deal, though I have no idea what that particular exchange rate was back then

 

[Spark]

What the **** does this have to do with Warne and Waugh?

 

[Viscount Tom]

Ah yes Warne and Waugh's telling of a bookie pitch conditions, I'm pretty much sure they could get that information by the pitch report or these days by twitter probably.

Not even close to what these players playing in India did.

 

[Furball]

What the **** does this have to do with Warne and Waugh?

Absolutely nothing unless you're trolling.

I wouldn't have thought that back in 1995 Warne didn't notice having to part with AUS$8000, although I suppose on reflection what Intcricket might have meant was that when you take into account the US$5000 Warne had been given in the first place that he wasn't really much down on the deal, though I have no idea what that particular exchange rate was back then

IIRC Warne lost the $5000 he'd been given from John at the casino.

 

[fredfertang]

IIRC Warne lost the $5000 he'd been given from John at the casino.

At least he didn't waste it on wine, women and song