Wes Hall & Maurice Tate
Wes Hall & Maurice Tate
Last edited by Jager; 21-05-2012 at 09:32 AM.
Oh for a strong arm and a walking stick
Snow and Hall
- BenaudFortunately, tonight is a reminder that older people and older players have the opportunity to applaud all the good things done by the modern-day players – their ability to play outstanding attacking cricket, their flair and inspiration and innovation; and it’s a reminder also, in a quiet way, to the modern-day players that good things have happened before, that in every era there have always been cricketers who have served the game well and have loved it, and wanted to see it flourish
Snow & Hall
How people are choosing Stewart over Dujon, Evans, Waite, Grout etc. is beyond me, to be honest.
Stewart as a keeper batsman is extremely over-rated. Russell was a far better keeper and not that much worse a batsman.
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!
Anyone want to join the Society?
Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
Stewart playing as Wicketkeeper batmen averaged around 36, so he's a fair bit better than Russell in the batting stakes when keeping and he was excellent against some of the best fast bowlers around in the 90's. Sure Russell was the better keeper but Stewart wouldn't let you down.
I just thought looking at the batting line up we could do with the best bat who was decent enough with gloves so I went with the all rounder, rather than the specialist, I really rate Russell though and have picked him before.
Rev. Wes Hall
Am I seeing correct that arguably the greatest pure keeper of the modern era is still available.
Simpson^ | Hayden | Bradman | Chappell^ | Ponting | Border* | Gilchrist+ | Davidson3 | Warne4^ | Lillee1 | McGrath2
Greenidge | Hunte | Richards^ | Headley* | Lara^ | Sobers5^ | Walcott+ | Marshall1 | Ambrose2 | Holding3 | Garner4
Richards^ | Smith*^ | Amla | Pollock | Kallis5^ | Nourse | Cameron+ | Procter3 | Steyn1 | Tayfield4 | Donald2
Hobbs | Hutton*^ | Hammond^ | Compton | Barrington | Botham5^ | Knott | Trueman1 | Laker4 | Larwood2 | Barnes3
"If that Swann lad is the future of spin bowling in this country, then we're ****ed." - Nasser Hussain, 1997.
So yeah, someone who you qualified as being roughly in the top 15 pure keepers hasn't been selected in the first 8 teams, not all of which would be suited to playing a pure keeper at all. That sounds entirely reasonable, no?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)