Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24-01-2004, 01:00 AM   #781 (permalink)
International 12th Man
 
deeps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: perth, australia
Posts: 1,661
invincible indeed....great catch to remove friend for naught
deeps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 01:01 AM   #782 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virat Kohli
Posts: 47,544
What a ripper of a catch from Laxman. He's having the series of a lifetime. Add that to channel 9's classic catches.
Jono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 01:14 AM   #783 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,346
Quote:
Originally posted by age_master
im not going to go on about this but - If watson isn't an all rounder - they dont exist anywhere
Oh they do, and there's plenty in World Cricket (particularly the One Day form)

Gayle
Pollock
Kallis
Flintoff
Streak

That's just 5, and all of them can be relied on to score runs and also bowl 10 overs.

Watson at the moment cannot by any stretch of the imagination, and his domestic one day performances don't suggest he'd be relied on to do it for a long time.
__________________
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

Anyone want to join the Society?

Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 01:17 AM   #784 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,346
Quote:
Originally posted by furious_ged
For sure. Watson is a good bowler. He's a 10 over bowler.
So how come his captains have only ever given him an average of 5 overs or so a game throughout his one day career?

If he were a 10 over bowler, you'd expect that figure to be much nearer the 7 or 8 level.

Perhaps it's because he doesn't actually take that many wickets or bowl that economically?
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 01:18 AM   #785 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,346
Quote:
Originally posted by age_master
FC batting average of 41 and bowling 25...
Relevance to One Day Cricket?

I note that despite the average he's only been called on to bowl an average of 13 or 14 overs in a match - that is fill in status, not main bowling status.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 01:20 AM   #786 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,346
Quote:
Originally posted by Slow Love™
On the Harvey/Watson issue. I think that it's possible that Watson will eventually replace Harvey, mainly because Harvey just isn't cutting it as an all-rounder.
I don't see how - Harvey is a specialist bowler who can swing the bat to good effect on occasion.

If you replace him with Watson, Watson will be batting down at 8!
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 01:31 AM   #787 (permalink)
International Captain
 
Slow Love™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,079
Quote:
Originally posted by marc71178
I don't see how - Harvey is a specialist bowler who can swing the bat to good effect on occasion.

If you replace him with Watson, Watson will be batting down at 8!
Right now, Michael Clarke is batting at number 7, as does Adam Gilchrist in tests. What's your point? While acknowledging that Harvey's a better bowler than a lot of posters are giving him credit for, I do believe that Watson presents more all-round promise. So did the Australian selectors before Watson was injured and Harvey replaced him in the World Cup tour party.
Slow Love™ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 02:16 AM   #788 (permalink)
School Boy/Girl Captain
 
rajat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Noida,INDIA
Posts: 141
Quote:
Originally posted by Pratyush
My prediction for today - India will lose to Zimbabwe. It has no relaion to Dravid getting out right now as I have felt the hunch right from the beginning of the match.

Predictions need not come true and I wouldnt even want this one to come true as I want India to win but I do think Zimbabwe will win this one.

HOW FUNNY
__________________
All positive feedback is welcome & may be directed to me. Just in case you have something negative to say, kindly write it on a clean sheet of paper and throw it in the dustbin. Cognitive dissonance is fatal !!


MEMBER OF AAAS,
AA IS THE BEST

COME ON INDIA DIKHA DO
rajat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 02:54 AM   #789 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra (in body), Perth (in spirit), Nagoya (in the future)
Posts: 1,258
Quote:
Originally posted by marc71178
Oh they do, and there's plenty in World Cricket (particularly the One Day form)

Gayle
Pollock
Kallis
Flintoff
Streak
I'll throw another one in: Ervine.
Gaijin-san is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 03:07 AM   #790 (permalink)
International Captain
 
Slow Love™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,079
Quote:
Originally posted by rajat
HOW FUNNY
The funny thing is, Zimbabwe aren't actually doing that bad, and Pratyush stands a chance of being right... :O

103 runs to win, 83 balls remaining, 7 wickets in hand, and Ervine and Carlisle both set.
Slow Love™ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 03:32 AM   #791 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Arjun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 7,837
Grrrrrrrrr...... Pie throwerssssss!!!!! They got far too much bowling.

Why can't they go for wickets instead? Get in your best bowlers (at least from one end) and set attacking fields.
Arjun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 04:05 AM   #792 (permalink)
International Captain
 
Slow Love™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,079
20 needed off two overs - Blignaut and Streak, two clean hitters, are in - 5 wickets in hand, but they won't matter that much...

Can Zimbabwe get there, or will they just miss out against India again? If anybody can do it in this team, these guys can.
Slow Love™ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 04:13 AM   #793 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator
 
Neil Pickup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 26,361
Ebrahim needs 6 off the last ball
__________________
MSN Messenger: minardineil2000 at hotmail dot com | AAAS Chairman
CricketWeb Black | CricketWeb XI Captain
ClarkeWatch: We're Watching Rikki - Are You?

Up The Grecians - Exeter City FC

Completing the Square: My Cricket Web Blog
Neil Pickup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 04:14 AM   #794 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator
 
Neil Pickup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 26,361
And doesn't manage it.

All-time Zimbabwe ODI record of 202 for the 4th wicket
Neil Pickup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-01-2004, 04:16 AM   #795 (permalink)
International Captain
 
Slow Love™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 6,079
Oh well. With 9 to get off the last over, I really thought they might do it. Poor Streak just couldn't make contact with the ball (the bouncer he left should have been called a no-ball though - it was way over his head).
Slow Love™ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:53 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web