• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Scorecard Draft III

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
In this draft it is perhaps a big advantage to be in last 2 in a draw (and hene be in first two in the next round)
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
One suggestion to Joe - how about allowing Bradman only in a specific round (say round 9 for example)? It'll be a trade-off between sacrificing some of your good picks and sacrificing Bradman in that case. It'll be interesting how many converge to the Bradman-era keeping that in mind, and how many take that chance by picking a bunch of quality players from other eras, sacrificing Bradman.
 
Last edited:

G.I.Joe

International Coach
One suggestion to Joe - how about allowing Bradman only in a specific round (say round 9 for example)? It'll be a trade-off between sacrificing some of your good picks and sacrificing Bradman in that case. It'll be interesting how many converge to the Bradman-era keeping that in mind, and how many take that chance by picking a bunch of quality players from other eras, sacrificing Bradman.
It's an interesting idea and adds a new dynamic, but IMO there's too much of the luck of the draw, in that of those who'll converge to his era, it'll end up benefitting whoever's highest in the Round 9 draft order.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah that's right.

It's amazing that in almost every draft we play, we think about him while deciding the rules. WAG!
 
Last edited:

Top