I think Rohit Sharma is a better option for a start.Back to the thread topic, Kohli is definitely test material but India has better options at the moment. He shouldn't have played these 2 tests.
Yes, definitely.I think Rohit Sharma is a better option for a start.
How would we know? He keeps getting out before we get a decent look at him
GF was always a bad poster and now he is running through a rough patchWas GF always such a bad poster, or is he running through a rough patch?
.
He acts like a tool, no doubt but saying his attitude is holding him back is one of those things people rattle off without any evidence simply because they've heard others say it.Kholi has major attitude issues. Unless he gets his temperament sorted out he can't succeed at test cricket.
Don't think it's necessarily the right move, but I wouldn't be surprised to see one of him, Sharma or Pujara pushed up to open at some stage over the next year or two. Get a few series doing it against some struggling teams and a bit of confidence, and any of them might end up making it their own, much like Sehwag.Opener? Struggling against quality out swing and you want him to open?!!
Yeah if they want to squeeze in an extra middle order bat (other than Rahane who they see as an opener) then Dravid just has to open.Would be such a backwards step for India if they make Kohli or Sharma open. Would be a move typical of them back in 2004 when they made Yuvi open.
I get the feeling they'd all do well at home and struggle in unfamiliar conditions at the moment. Rohit strikes me as the one most likely to hold his own away while I think Kohli's the most likely to boss it at home. None of them are lost causes though; I have high hopes for all three plus Rahane.Not writing him off. But at the moment who do you think will do well given a long run? Kohli, Rohit or Pujara?