Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2003, 11:46 AM   #1 (permalink)
U19 Vice-Captain
 
Ford_GTHO351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 585
Test Match or One Day Cricket

I love Cricket & both forms of the game are great.

But if I was forced to pick out of the two, I would pick One Day Cricket. One Day Internationals (ODI's) are very exciting, whether it be very agressive batting from the likes of Adam Gilchrist, the likes of great fielding from players such as Andrew Symonds or Ricky Ponting, or the likes of watching Michael Bevan play a match winning innings.

Though the Australian Test Team deserve credit as they play Tests which more follow ODI's than in years gone by. Adam Gilchrist boasts a ODI batting strike rate of 92.26! In Tests, Gilchrist boasts a strike rate of 83.59 which is amazing as this is more than alot of ODI cricketers batting strike rates!

So what are all your opinions. Test or ODI cricket (if you were forced to choose)?
Ford_GTHO351 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 11:54 AM   #2 (permalink)
School Boy/Girl Captain
 
IsuraE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 118
I would most certainly choose test cricket if I had to choose one
form of the game. One day cricket can be exciting if both teams are good, otherwise it can get very predictable. For example the current England Bangledesh series, the match is basically decided in the first 15 overs.
IsuraE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 11:55 AM   #3 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 2005
Posts: 80,407
Simple for me - the World Cup's in one-dayers, but Tests are the oldest form.
Each has their merits and I'd be very, very sad if deprived of either.
__________________
RD
Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
(Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
Quote:
chris.hinton: h
FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 11:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 2005
Posts: 80,407
Quote:
Originally posted by IsuraE
I would most certainly choose test cricket if I had to choose one
form of the game. One day cricket can be exciting if both teams are good, otherwise it can get very predictable. For example the current England Bangledesh series, the match is basically decided in the first 15 overs.
And The Second Test was different because...?
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 12:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator
 
Neil Pickup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 26,361
ODIs are good for a quick fix, but nothing can ever match the depth of thought and tactics and the way that things can change in Test Cricket.
__________________
MSN Messenger: minardineil2000 at hotmail dot com | AAAS Chairman
CricketWeb Black | CricketWeb XI Captain
ClarkeWatch: We're Watching Rikki - Are You?

Up The Grecians - Exeter City FC

Completing the Square: My Cricket Web Blog
Neil Pickup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 12:38 PM   #6 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Mr Mxyzptlk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad)
Posts: 36,795
No question - Test cricket.

For reasons, see WI v Australia 4th Test 2003; WI v Aus 3rd Test 1999; WI v Pak 3rd Test 2000; WI v Zim 1st Test 2000.
__________________
Sreesanth said, "Next ball he was beaten and I said, 'is this the King Charles Lara? Who is this impostor, moving around nervously? I should have kept my mouth shut for the next ball - mind you, it was a length ball - Lara just pulled it over the church beyond the boundary! He is a true legend."

Mr Mxyzptlk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 01:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,346
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr Mxyzptlk
No question - Test cricket.

For reasons, see WI v Australia 4th Test 2003; WI v Aus 3rd Test 1999; WI v Pak 3rd Test 2000; WI v Zim 1st Test 2000.
* notes Liam forgot to mention Zim v WI 1st Test 2003 *
__________________
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

Anyone want to join the Society?

Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 01:33 PM   #8 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 2005
Posts: 80,407
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr Mxyzptlk
No question - Test cricket.

For reasons, see WI v Australia 4th Test 2003; WI v Aus 3rd Test 1999; WI v Pak 3rd Test 2000; WI v Zim 1st Test 2000.
Huhm-huhm! How about Eng v WI Second Test 2000?
Better than all that lot. Probably better than it all put together. Not just a thrilling last innings but an inconceivable last two and two other exceptional ones.
Best Test of all-time surely.
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 02:42 PM   #9 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
Samuel_Vimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oslo
Posts: 22,255
Quote:
Originally posted by IsuraE
I would most certainly choose test cricket if I had to choose one
form of the game. One day cricket can be exciting if both teams are good, otherwise it can get very predictable. For example the current England Bangledesh series, the match is basically decided in the first 15 overs.
Welcome to the forums, IsuraE. Good to see another one from a minnow country (although you'd thrash us easily :P)

As for the question at hand, well, I prefer Tests. It's what everybody in Norway first laugh at when they hear about the game (How can anyone watch a game that takes 5 days?), but it is much more exciting, it can change in a matter that no ODI can, and it lasts longer.
__________________
Messi scores on the rebound.

Founder of ESAS - Edgar Schiferli, the best associate bowler
A follower of the schools of Machiavelli, Bentham, Locke, Hobbes, Sutcliffe, Bradman, Lindwall, Miller, Hassett and Benaud
Member of JMAS, DMAS, FRAS and RTDAS

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adolf Grünbaum
Is the conduct approved by the gods right ("pious"), because of properties of its own, or merely because it pleases the gods to value or command it?
Samuel_Vimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 03:16 PM   #10 (permalink)
Soutie
 
Langeveldt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stellenbosch - South Africa
Posts: 29,336
Watch Allan Donald against Mike Atherton in 1998 (or any other great confrontations for that matter such as Shoaib-Hayden) and you will soon realize that test cricket provides a dimension that simply doesnt exist in the one day game...

I love One day cricket too, I prefer coloured kits and a white ball, but I like more the grit and attrition you get in test matches..

SO tests all the way for me...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
Don't like using my iPod dock. Ruins battery life too much.
Quote:
Originally Posted by benchmark00 View Post
Thanks Dick Smith. Will remember to subscribe to your newsletter for more electronic fun facts.

****.
Langeveldt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 03:33 PM   #11 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
age_master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Posts: 15,777
ODI's for me, they are more attacking, particularly highlighting fielding skills
__________________
Member of CW Green
Kerry O'Keefe - Worlds funniest Commentator
age_master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 03:40 PM   #12 (permalink)
Soutie
 
Langeveldt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stellenbosch - South Africa
Posts: 29,336
Quote:
Originally posted by age_master
ODI's for me, they are more attacking, particularly highlighting fielding skills
But are they though? I know they are from a batting point of view, but one day cricket has bread a lot of mundane, defensive captaincy and bowling...

The sight of Shoaib steaming in, first morning of a test match trying to knock a guys poles over, with 5 slips and 2 gullies, thats attacking too
Langeveldt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 05:35 PM   #13 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Prince EWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 37,757
Quote:
Originally posted by Langeveldt
But are they though? I know they are from a batting point of view, but one day cricket has bread a lot of mundane, defensive captaincy and bowling...

The sight of Shoaib steaming in, first morning of a test match trying to knock a guys poles over, with 5 slips and 2 gullies, thats attacking too
I agree with you 100%. I much more enjoy a brilliant spell of bowling than a brilliant spell of batting and test cricket shows far better and more attacking bowling.

When I first started watching cricket, I enjoyed ODIs 100x more, but gradually as I apreciated the game more and more, and understood the tactics and the changes in test cricked, I liked test cricket more and more than ODIs. And now its ahead by a mile.

Test cricket defiantely for my answer.
__________________
~ Cribbage
Prince EWS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 05:58 PM   #14 (permalink)
World Traveller
 
Craig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Super Happy Fun Sugar Lollipop Land!
Posts: 34,131
Quote:
Originally posted by Samuel_Vimes
Welcome to the forums, IsuraE. Good to see another one from a minnow country (although you'd thrash us easily :P)

As for the question at hand, well, I prefer Tests. It's what everybody in Norway first laugh at when they hear about the game (How can anyone watch a game that takes 5 days?), but it is much more exciting, it can change in a matter that no ODI can, and it lasts longer.
Do you get much coverage/if any of cricket in Norway? If not, then how were you attracted to this great game?
__________________
Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick once and you suck forever...

RIP Fardin Qayyumi, a true legend of CW

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boobidy View Post
Bradman never had to face quicks like Sharma and Irfan Pathan. He wouldn't of lasted a ball against those 2, not to mention a spinner like Sehwag.
Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2003, 06:07 PM   #15 (permalink)
World Traveller
 
Craig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Super Happy Fun Sugar Lollipop Land!
Posts: 34,131
Quote:
Originally posted by Samuel_Vimes
Welcome to the forums, IsuraE. Good to see another one from a minnow country (although you'd thrash us easily :P)

As for the question at hand, well, I prefer Tests. It's what everybody in Norway first laugh at when they hear about the game (How can anyone watch a game that takes 5 days?), but it is much more exciting, it can change in a matter that no ODI can, and it lasts longer.
I never saw a ball of that series, but there have been plenty of other great Tests before and since that should be ranked up there.
Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web