Nothing be said here that hasn't already been said ad nauseam in other threads. I don't understand Brearley's garbled message, and I can't be bothered trying to decode it any more than I can be bothered arguing with people who reckon we should be dishing out life bans to teenagers.
Far more importantly I'm concerned to see another pompously titled cricket lecture - "the Voice of Cricket Speech" no less. At least they've not called it a ****ing "Oration" though. Small mercies.