Australia 46-53: Lindwall, Miller, Johnston
England 50s: Bedser, Trueman, Statham, Tyson
Aus early 60s: Davidson, McKenzie (with Benaud)
WI 60s: Hall, then Griffith too.
SA late 60s-60s: Pollock, Procter
England early 70s: Snow then Willis and a couple of solid blokes plus Underwood
Australia 70s: Lillee and Thomson, Walker, Gilmour
WI: well, a dozen of them
Aus 90s-00s: McGrath, McDermott, Hughes, Gillespie. Plus Warne obvs
India: the only time they had a really decent pacer since Dev: Zaheer, plus a bit of Sharma plus Lol-Sreesanth.
England: Glanderson, Tremlett, Broad, that Yorkshire buffoon who looks like he's just out of the pub (can't think of him), Finn.
Last edited by Burgey; 19-12-2011 at 11:30 PM.
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn
#408. Sixty three not out forever.
People on here can blow as many loads as they like over spinners, it's a fact.
This thread isn't really about whether or not they have the potential to become a dominant #1 side though.
The point is, if SL or anyone else, wants to be number one, they decent a stock of good or better quicks.
For countries like SL, that means breaking their pre-existing paradigms. Otherwise, you're happy with somewhere between 3-5 in the rankings long term.
And that stinks, if you're happy with that.
Being number one for a year is an achievement, but you can't tell me Zaheer + mediocre quick + good spinners = recipe for long term domination. Can't be.
haha.......at least get SL get back to really competitive rather than making them a dominant force overnight
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW
Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)