• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Do Bangladesh deserve Test Status

jashan83

U19 Captain
Bangladesh are going backwards

Bangladesh's Test match status has been debated ever since they were awarded full membership by the ICC a little over 11 years ago. Bangladesh played their first Test match in November 2000, and since then have won just three of 72 matches, with a staggering 62 losses. Even those three wins were not much to cheer about, as they came against Zimbabwe and a severely weakened West Indies team.

The team has shown some signs of improvement in ODI cricket over the last few years with a few surprise victories – the 4-0 drubbing of New Zealand at home last October, for example – but in 2011, it has been clear that they are actually taking backward steps.

Bangladesh are too reliant on their world-class allrounder, Shakib Al Hasan, and Tamim Iqbal, one of Wisden’s five cricketers of 2010. Talented youngsters like Mahmudullah and Nasir Hossain have shown encouraging signs, but Bangladesh just don't have enough star players to compete with the more established teams.

Mohammad Ashraful's career sums up Bangladesh's performance over the last decade. He showed plenty of promise and was obviously very talented, but he couldn't kick on after a good start due to dodgy technique and temperament. Their 2011 World Cup campaign resulted in them being bowled out for under 100 twice, including an embarrassing 58 all out in Mirpur against an average West Indies attack.

If Bangladesh are severely struggling in their favoured format, then it doesn't bode well for their Test future. There are many areas of concern, but their main problem is the batting. Tamim, seemingly, has tried to emulate Virender Sehwag by scoring run-a-ball centuries and he has been reasonably successful in his short international career to date. Consistency is where he and his team-mates falter.

The batsmen might produce the odd wonder innings but more often than not they fall early in their innings. This is why most of their batting averages are down in the 20s. The batsmen fail to knuckle down and grind out an innings, and this lack of fight is very disappointing to cricket fans around the world. It's as if they don't want to be out there in the middle.

However, it isn't just the batting that is sub-standard. Their bowling also lacks the firepower that is needed for Test cricket. The seam attack is virtually non-existent and five-wicket hauls are as rare as wins. Shakib is a highly skilled spinner, but that he outshines his team-mates even in this aspect is not something to be celebrated.

These cricketers obviously have plenty of talent but during their international careers, they haven't converted that promise into match-winning performances, meaning Bangladesh remain at the bottom of the ladder. That Zimbabwe are showing signs of improvement on their return to Test cricket only heightens the challenge that Bangladesh face. While most countries around them are improving, they appear to be in steady decline.

It is a very sad situation that Bangladeshi cricket is in. Many cricket fans have been willing them to do well over the past decade, but many have now lost faith in the subcontinent outfit. It is likely that they are going nowhere.

Inbox | Cricket Blogs | ESPN Cricinfo
 

jashan83

U19 Captain
Personally I feel it is high time to be making Test Cricket based on Merit. Just because one nation is a Test nation and the team level even worse than Associate does not give it any right to have direct qualification to World Cup or World Twenty20

It is time we have 2 Tier in Test

Tier 1:- Aus, Eng, Ind, NZ, Pak, SA, SL & WI
Tier 2:- Afg, BD, Can, Ire, Ken, Neth, Scot & Zim

2013 to 2017 The Tier remain the same

In 2017
Top 4 in Tier 1 play the World Test Championship

Bottom 2 Tier 1+ Top 2 Tier 2 play a Challenge Test Championship:- Top 2 make it into Tier 1 & rest 2 relegated back to Tier 2

Bottom 2 of Tier 2 get relegated back into World Cricket League
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
I sort of disagree with anything being "clear" in terms of where they are in Test cricket, solely because they play so few matches. Could they just be rusty after such a long break from Test cricket? Possibly.

Fact is last year they showed more in the Test arena than they ever had in their history, and what they've shown this year has been more of the same old terribleness. Watching how they play Zimbabwe/West Indies and New Zealand in the coming few years will probably give us a better idea of where they are right now.

Personally I'd enjoy more Test teams coming through than ever dropping any out. Limiting Tests played is preferable to expulsion.
 

ganeshran

International Debutant
The 2 tier system is the best idea. Bangladesh doesnt have the goods currently to do well in 2 consecutive sessions, let alone win a match against a top side.
 

jashan83

U19 Captain
I sort of disagree with anything being "clear" in terms of where they are in Test cricket, solely because they play so few matches. Could they just be rusty after such a long break from Test cricket? Possibly.

Fact is last year they showed more in the Test arena than they ever had in their history, and what they've shown this year has been more of the same old terribleness. Watching how they play Zimbabwe/West Indies and New Zealand in the coming few years will probably give us a better idea of where they are right now.

Personally I'd enjoy more Test teams coming through than ever dropping any out. Limiting Tests played is preferable to expulsion.
They have potential I definitely agree but so do teams like Ireland, Afghanistan, Scotland, Netherlands or even Nepal. If the Irish and Afghans I have doubt they can be much better than Bangladesh. So the point I want to make is if we want to give BD a chance then so should these nations also.

If you say BD needs more exposure by playing maybe A teams then we should be equal with the top Associate's also
 

TumTum

Banned
The 2 tier system is the best idea.
Agree. BD and ZIM should not be playing against other Test nations. But with this maybe we could put them in a group with new teams like Ireland etc.

We could also have top team from lower tier to get into higher tier and the lowest ranked top tier team taken to the lower tier every year or two.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
how many years were nz, sl etc around before they stopped being useless
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
how many years were nz, sl etc around before they stopped being useless
SL was never as useless as Bangladesh were during their first 9 years. I haven't followed NZ cricket history very closely, so can't comment on them.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
how many years were nz, sl etc around before they stopped being useless
A lot longer than this, just didn't have so many Tests which make the record look so bad.

Problem is Bangladesh will not learn anything from playing against the other associates IMO.

As for the suggestion of promoting and relegating 2 teams every few years, well that's a complete farcical one.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
SL always had a decent batting line-up it was always the bowling that was the trouble (still is now)
 

smash84

The Tiger King
When the bangers won that WC 1999 match against Pak (which was what resulted them in getting test status IIRC) there were lots of cries of match fixing after that match.

Rumors in Pakistan were certainly rife that it was a fixed match.

Even Wasim's post match speech was a bit strange IIRC.

Was it the most damaging instance of match fixing ever?
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Bangladesh would kill for a few of the current Sri Lankan pace bowlers. Thats how bad their pace bowling stocks are.

Bangers have a bunch of fairly decent slow left armers and a few other decent spinners but in terms of pace bowling options they're 12th or so in the world.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Is taking Test status away from them likely to help?

Does "Test status" really need to be an honorific?
 

NasserFan207

International Vice-Captain
Eh.. its a tough one. Honestly the main issue for Bangladesh AND associate sides like Ireland or Afghanistan is the first class (or lack off) structure. Young Bangladeshi players are trained to play ODI or T-20 cricket, and it shows in their national team. That said, I don't think kicking them out of the test 'club' would help them in any way.

Lets be honest here. Teams like Ireland and Afghanistan stand even less chance of succeeding in test cricket, so a tier system where sides get demoted/promoted won't change much either.

No, the only way any of these sides will become competitive test nations is by developing a viable FC structure first. /End
 

Top