• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Has batting in tests become too aggressive.

ganeshran

International Debutant
Has test batting become more about hitting out and losing wickets in a heap rather than grinding it out and patiently building an innings?
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
70-75: RPO 2.59

75-80: RPO 2.77

80-85: RPO 2.89

85-90: RPO 2.83

90-95: RPO 2.84

95-00: RPO 2.87

00-05: RPO 3.10

05-10: RPO 3.33

10-present RPO 3.25

So basically the average SR has went from 43 in the 70s to the 54 of today. Significant but not wholly ridiculous either IMO.
 
Last edited:

ganeshran

International Debutant
Thanks Athlai, that pretty much sums it. Aggressive batting is good to watch but IMO the beauty of building a test innings patiently is lost in the slogathon
 

Viscount Tom

International Debutant
Australia team at the start of the 2000s could pound opposition at a fierce rate, when England needed to challenge them in '05 they felt the need to do this as well; other teams started to follow on from this example.

Add in T20 and well technique's become more aggressive and flawed.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Dunno, batsmen are scoring more runs than they used to. Seems counter-intuitive to suggest that the old way was better when it yielded so many fewer runs.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
Yeah, if people/businesses/teams/governments/whatever spot other similar bodies getting success out of a particular way of doing something, they'll inevitably copy it. Following suit is how you stay competitive in pretty much anything you do, you have to adapt to your environment (whatever it may be), or you will be left behind.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It just seems a lot of players (well ours) don't change gears as much to reflect conditions. They just launch irrespective.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I think more than all this, the modern captaincy has become very defensive, across all the teams. Dhoni keeping 3 men out for Darren Sammy walking in with his team less than a 100 for 6 says it all, IMO.
 

Xuhaib

International Coach
70-75: RPO 2.59

75-80: RPO 2.77

80-85: RPO 2.89

85-90: RPO 2.83

90-95: RPO 2.84

95-00: RPO 2.87

00-05: RPO 3.10

05-10: RPO 3.33

10-present RPO 3.25

So basically the average SR has went from 43 in the 70s to the 54 of today. Significant but not wholly ridiculous either IMO.


all lies.
 
Last edited:

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Australia team at the start of the 2000s could pound opposition at a fierce rate, when England needed to challenge them in '05 they felt the need to do this as well; other teams started to follow on from this example.
There was always a feeling with that Australian team that the way to beat them was by taking them on at their own game, by playing ultra-aggressive back at them. But the current England attack absolutely thrives on that mentality. When batsmen try to hit them off their line and length, full and swinging away outside off stump, they invariably nick out. The most effective batsmen have been guys like Dravid and Hussey that are excellent at letting the ball go outside off stump. Impulsive drivers like Ponting and Sehwag have embarrassed themselves.

It's interesting- one dominant team establishes a strategy, and the next dominant team is the one that finds a way of exploiting that strategy. If a team had bowled the lines that England often do back in the 80s, opposing batsmen might have just watched ball after ball float by outside off stump. But most of them today are too ingrained with the mentality that aggressive=good to do that.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think more than all this, the modern captaincy has become very defensive, across all the teams. Dhoni keeping 3 men out for Darren Sammy walking in with his team less than a 100 for 6 says it all, IMO.
England exploit this remarkably well too. They run harder between the wickets than any side I've ever seen, they take on 3s that you'd think were suicidal and get there with yards to spare. I think they've realised just how hard it is to effect a run-out from the boundary and take calculated risks with that in mind.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
It's interesting- one dominant team establishes a strategy, and the next dominant team is the one that finds a way of exploiting that strategy.
Surely that's the case in any sport played at any level at any time though, in fact it probably can be applied in a lot of contexts, not just those of a sporting variety.
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
If the run-rate was slower, then there'd be a **** load of draws. So, in this case aggression is a good thing.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
I think more than all this, the modern captaincy has become very defensive, across all the teams. Dhoni keeping 3 men out for Darren Sammy walking in with his team less than a 100 for 6 says it all, IMO.
Ross Taylor has shown glimpses of being a more aggressive captain. Hopefully a few guys emulate those tendencies.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
70-75: RPO 2.59

75-80: RPO 2.77

80-85: RPO 2.89

85-90: RPO 2.83

90-95: RPO 2.84

95-00: RPO 2.87

00-05: RPO 3.10

05-10: RPO 3.33

10-present RPO 3.25

So basically the average SR has went from 43 in the 70s to the 54 of today. Significant but not wholly ridiculous either IMO.
To what extent is the increased RR in the last 10 years down to teams thrashing Bangladesh and Zimbabwe before they got booted?
 

Top