He's Scottish.Well, the picture perhaps? cant find the joke in there perhaps.
Just an impression.
PS: What went wrong , is he an aussie?
AWTAYou are an Indian I think.
poor form /buzzkillI seem to recall television cameras catching Umar Gul giving the ball a little scratch in the Pakistan/New Zealand series. I distinctly remember Simon Doull saying he was a legend for doing it.
He's Scottish.
I wouldn't be shocked if >50% of bowlers do it. Obviously as a spectator I have nfi, but I wouldn't be surprised at all.
Wait he got away with that without even a warning?
Awta.Still amazed that he got away. That footage is pretty much undeniable.
if a player from an asian team did this then they would have a big deal out it labeling the whole team cheats etc, if a british guy stamps on the ball or scratches it then its not counted as ball tampering?
Take the pathetic persecution complex some place else, to where it belongs like YouTube or Pakpassion.awta.
But Darrell Hair did punish (without proof).Take the pathetic persecution complex some place else, to where it belongs like YouTube or Pakpassion.
If a player from an Asian did it? Pretty much every time since the early 90s (and perhaps before then as well, but I'm going from personal memory) that Pakistan have toured here they've been caught doing it on camera, then it gets swept under the carpet with zero punishment. It's only the tabloids that take any real interest.
He is saying he saw it himself.Also, people ought to remember the difference between "accusation" and "idle speculaton".
So why not mention it at the time instead of being a moaning little ***** over 12 months later?He is saying he saw it himself.
So the problem is that he is exposing it, not the stunning hypocrisy of the English??lol.So why not mention it at the time instead of being a moaning little ***** over 12 months later?
Don't think he was moaning. He was asked a question relating to Akhtar's quote on ball tampering and he himself said that he doesn't have a problem with it.So why not mention it at the time instead of being a moaning little ***** over 12 months later?
If he has proof then i don't see why not. As it stands he is making an unfounded accusation a year after the event.So the problem is that he is exposing it, not the stunning hypocrisy of the English??lol.
For the record he wasn't moaning, he was speaking candidly about shoaibs bio and ball tampering in general, he cited Anderson as a specific case.
Do you think there should be retrospective punishment??
I am guessing same reason the spot fixing trio lied. It comes naturally to some people.He has saying he saw it with his eyes, what reason would he have to lie?