if they plan to play smith as they always play him eg pretty much the exact opposite way he should be played then yeah i support marsh. smith isn't a big hitter and if he's not gonna get bowled...
if they plan to play smith as they always play him eg pretty much the exact opposite way he should be played then yeah i support marsh. smith isn't a big hitter and if he's not gonna get bowled...
Indians can't bowl - Where has the rumour come from as I myself and many indian friends arwe competent fast bowlers ?
With the English bid I said: Let us be brief. If you give back the Falkland Islands, which belong to us, you will get my vote. They then became sad and left
Agree that MMarsh has noting but potential on his side, but I think if Watson's injury really messes up Clarke's bowling plans then he might need Mitch's seam ups to fill in, considering it's a short-term solution anyway with Watson. Makes sense to me.
Maybe we wouldn't be so quick to fill buckets with filth if we knew they had a soul. Or maybe that's what they're into. Ain't no way to get inside a bucket's mind.
yeah that's the big counter-argument. i don't think you can really make a strong case for marsh on merit alone.
+ time's fickle card game ~ with you and i +
cummins to be pretty much the only 21st century player from a major country to take his first list a wicket in an ODI
aside from all those pesky batsmen
Parmi | #1 draft pick | Jake King is **** | PM me for my list of CW posters you shouldn't talk cricket with in Cricket ChatCome and Paint Turtle
So Watson injured. SMarsh too, I assume.Warner, Ponting, Clarke, Hussey, Smith, Haddin, M.Marsh, Johnson, Doherty, Bollinger, Cummins, Pattinson (12)
To say that batting looks thin is an alarming understatement. Gonna need quite a few runs from the big three...
s. marsh injured?! never
Ponting opening.
*teenage girl noises*
One side effect of being a simpleton is ambiguity.
2 new balls? I assumed that was just a domestic thing. not a fan of such a fundamental change. Double the length of time of new ball.
Lol. Sky's coverage opens with the obligatory mention of Edgbaston in 99.
No Tahir for SA. Interesting. Gah, Colville says the Saffers are going with one spinner. Not like Du Plessis or Duminy bowl slow, is it?
- As featured in The Independent.
"This is not the time for namby-pamby promising youngsters who might just do something; not the time for building for the future. Pragmatism rules and they don't come more pragmatic than Rogers."
- Victor Marks makes the case for stiff-legged and stiff-armed 35 year old left-handers in Ashes squads
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)