LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksOriginally Posted by Burgey
Indians can't bowl - Where has the rumour come from as I myself and many indian friends arwe competent fast bowlers ?
With the English bid I said: Let us be brief. If you give back the Falkland Islands, which belong to us, you will get my vote. They then became sad and left
Lol. Yeah, maybe not the most ideal role model for the aspiring young quick in terms of longeivity.
Hadn't occured to me, but can see it now you mention it.
- As featured in The Independent.
"Straight out of England's Bumper Book of Balls ups"
- Mike Selvey on England's first innings collapse at The Gabba
Yeah I said that to my dad a couple of days back when he asked me what his action was like. He had mixed emotions about the news.
~ Cribbage
Reckon he kind of looks like a right handed Dirk Nannes.
Whaaaa...?
looks like watto's out of the odi... that probably means either smith or mmarsh at 6, and either way leaves the batting looking a tad thin when you consider that hussey used to constantly bail us out/boost us from there.
+ time's fickle card game ~ with you and i +
get ready for a broken ****in' arm
It will be a shock if they leave out Smith. He's just... there.
Would explain why Cummins is able to swing it both ways at his pace not to mention has good control for a quick.
I would say Mitch Marsh or Smith would be at 7.
Action isn't particularly similair imo, general style and demeanor is though.
Exit pursued by a bear
Australia (probable) 1 Shaun Marsh, 2 David Warner, 3 Ricky Ponting, 4 Michael Clarke (capt), 5 Michael Hussey, 6 Mitchell Marsh, 7 Brad Haddin (wk), 8 Mitchell Johnson, 9 Pat Cummins, 10 Xavier Doherty, 11 Doug Bollinger.
Happy with that team
I'm honestly not convinced at all that MMarsh > Smith ats. In any discipline.
well he's a bigger hitter
Nice to have something to look forward to in our ODI side. Warner, one of Cummins/Pattinson and possible Mitch Marsh.
AWTA. Probably suits the conditions and the balance of the team a little better though, especially if Haddin bats 6.
perhaps, but surely the fact that smith is, at this stage, a much better cricketer should be a more important consideration. dunno.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote