There is no point of coming into this thread
what will happen first; 100 100's or a DRS controversy?
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts.. . For support rather than illumination. " - Andrew Lang (1844-1912)
Someone cock block me from this thread please.
your cock is blocked?
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW
Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta
We miss you, Fardin. :(. RIP.
A cricket supporter forever
Member of CW Red and AAAS - Appreciating only the best.
Check out this awesome e-fed:
He posted the rules ffs. Do you need us to send you an autographed copy as well?
It tracks the ball. Using the real data, it can form a prediction of what the ball will do after it hits the pad. Not that it matters when you refer to the rules outlined before.
And yes it most certainly can. UDRS has hundreds, if not thousands, of data points plotted to know how the ball has already moved, meaning it can plot the rest of the trend reasonably accurately. The human eye gets less than a second to process everything it sees, and no replays.
And I have spoken to one highly regarded international umpire who says it is most difficult to judge the amount of swing and spin on certain tracks.. So he obviously DID consider it and no one from the ICC thought it fit to tell him that the laws don't say that. This is like the chucking law, isn't it? Where it states only about straigthtening the elbow but the ICC then said you could always bowl with a bent arm straightened...
God, I wish I had the power to moderate threads I created.
RIP Craig Walsh (Craig) 1985-2012
Proudly supporting the #2 cricketer of all time.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)