I dunno - is it?Is it not standard CWer protocol to assume it's about Tests unless stated otherwise?
border was a slip...should come right after viv, in the second position...Gooch, Crowe and Miandad over Border? Really?
and i am for u tooFmd how can anyone rate gavaskar or Barry Richards over Greg Chappell.
I'm embarrassed for you.
when greg chappell retired in early 1984, this is how his records stacked up against sunny's.Fmd how can anyone rate gavaskar or Barry Richards over Greg Chappell.
I'm embarrassed for you.
Did you, you know, like watch them play?when greg chappell retired in early 1984, this is how his records stacked up against sunny's.
SM Gavaskar (India) 99 174 14 8394 236* 52.46 30 36 10
GS Chappell (Aus) 87 151 19 7110 247* 53.86 24 31 12
what is so embarrassing about ranking either one over the other?
yeah. both were awesome. i can toss a coin and choose either the master technician or mr. elegance. they were joint second among the batsmen of their times; only a tiny whisker behind viv.Did you, you know, like watch them play?
can't be a comment for real. will put it down to the rugby!Fmd how can anyone rate gavaskar or Barry Richards over Greg Chappell.
I'm embarrassed for you.
completely agree.yeah. both were awesome. i can toss a coin and choose either the master technician or mr. elegance. they were joint second among the batsmen of their times; only a tiny whisker behind viv.
You rate those blokes ahead of Viv Richards?sunil gavaskar
greg chappell
allan border
Javid maindad
modessor nazar
these player is good in 70 to 80 make many record in cricket games.
Not really. It's a different matter that most here (like me) places a lot of emphasis on test cricket. But for me, when I rate certain batsmen and bowlers (not all, for various reasons) FC records and ODI records play a part.isn't international the default setting for discussing cricket at CW just like discussing a player test matches is the default mode?