• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Would Stuart Broad make the world's strongest XI?

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
So in seriousness...where does everyone stand on the Broad in the World XI issue now?
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
A lot of people had Zaheer/Morkel/Philander etc ahead of him in recent times. Be interesting to see what people think.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
There's more competition now than before imo. Zak's fallen out of the XI for mine, but now there's Philander and Pattinson to compete with. I realise they haven't played many games each, especially outside of home conditions, but you can't ignore their impressive performances. Not to mention Broad also only has the India and Pakistan (as well as today) to boast about, which is a similiar number of games compared to Philander.

I'd have Steyn, Philander, Ajmal and Anderson/Broad. Seems harsh on Anderson because he's been so consistently good, but I :wub: Philander.
 
Last edited:

Spark

Global Moderator
I'd actually say he's the easiest of the four to pick bowlers because he fills the bowling "all-rounder" role basically alone. Three of Steyn, Anderson, Philander, Broad and one of Swann and Ajmal. Pattinson isn't in the running IMO.
Would be curious to see what people's World XIs are now tbh. A lot of movement over the last year. Especially in the batting.
 
Last edited:

Cabinet96

Global Moderator
Broad would probably make mine, with Steyn, Anderson and Swann. He's performed all round the world for a year now and as Spark mentioned his batting adds much value.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Steyn, Anderson and Broad for me with Ajmal as spinner.

Difficult to make a massive case for Philander and Pattinson after so few games though that could change should they carry on for a few more at their present rate.
 

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I'd actually say he's the easiest of the four to pick bowlers because he fills the bowling "all-rounder" role basically alone. Three of Steyn, Anderson, Philander, Broad and one of Swann and Ajmal. Pattinson isn't in the running IMO.
Would be curious to see what people's World XIs are now tbh. A lot of movement over the last year. Especially in the batting.
Bowling is a fair bit more clear cut than the batting right now for sure, not sure where I would start picking a batting lineup right now.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Sanga
Kallis
Clarke
Chanders

is my middle order. ABdV stiff, as is Younis.
I'd have Cook opening. Not really sure who else opens with him, I suppose the flip side of the fast bowling renaissance that's occurring is that openers are suffering.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Openers I have no idea other than Cook. I guess that Smith and Warner (!) are the only real contenders.
 
Last edited:

Pothas

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Always depends on what length of time you are judging on, if I picked a side I would still go with Sehwag even though there is no basis for doing so on recent performances.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Before this test my XI probably would've been:

Smith*, Cook, Kallis, Younis, Chanderpaul, De Villiers, Prior+, Swann, Steyn, Ajmal, Anderson
 

Spark

Global Moderator
If that's the case I presume you're picking Philander over Steyn?
See that's the thing. By that logic, yes, but something in my head is saying "ehhhh..."

I think recent performances are the major factor but weighted by how established the player is (and hence how good an idea we have of how good the player 'actually' is). But yeah, overall by that logic:

Cook
Smith
Sanga
Kallis
Clarke*
Chanderpaul
Prior
Broad
Swann
Philander/Steyn
Anderson

But I just want to play both Philander and Steyn. In the end what gets Anderson over the line is that he was outstanding in both the UAE and SL where there was much less assistance for the bowlers.

EDIT: And my philosophy on batting orders would see Clarke batting at 6 usually, but having your captain coming in at 6 is a bit strange


EDIT2: Having said this, I think picking Chanders to bat at 6 would be entirely at odds with the view on Chanders' bubble-batting, and to see him sandwiched between Clarke and Prior, very much strokeplayers both of them, is a bit strange. Ideally, this would be where I would pick Mike Hussey - highly adaptable, consistent and superb at batting with what is a reasonably strong lower order with Broad, Swann and possibly Philander there.
 
Last edited:

Manee

Cricketer Of The Year
Broad didn't bowl as well as his figures showed, imo. I watched the whole day and he didn't bowl particularly well with the new ball and just seemed to pick up wickets out of nowhere with the old ball. Perhaps that is the sign of a good bowler, but it won't go down as one of the great 7-fers, imo. I'm aware that devaluing a statistically sound performance is often maligned on these forums and also agree that performances and not the nature of performances should dictate how 'good' a player is, but that is just my opinion on the matter.
 

Top