London riot

[sarmad jamal]

Now see what's happening out there but still they are willing to play 3rd test. that's not fair all other teams have a planned BOYCOTT for not to play in Pakistan because of SECURITY RISK. Now can any one answer me that isn't that is a security risk ANY ONE!!!!

 

[Top_Cat]

Well, there are many reasons, all of them fairly obvious so I won't bother listing them all. Instead, I'll do 1 and throw to the CW faithful to continue;

1) The rioters haven't specifically targeted people.

Next?

 

[Burgey]

2) The rioters haven't shot at either team's bus.

 

[Burgey]

3) England wasn't harboring Osama Bin Laden.

 

[TT Boy]

Just Google search Pakistan bomb blast August 2011 and the read the almost daily reports of bomb blasts killing people all over the country and then comeback here and post more dribble.

Greggs the baker was looted. The UK is still far off becoming a failed state like Pakistan.

 

[kingpin]

Sl team got shot at their Bus!!!!WTH r u talking now??

 

[Bun]

england's hosting a bunch of cricketerd whom enemies would sympathise with currently. :x

 

[benchmark00]

Because noone in the world would care if the English and Indian cricket team didn't exist obv.

 

[flibbertyjibber]

What TC and Burgey said.

So far people in these riots haven't been blowing each other up, worst incident was last night a hit and run in Birmingham where 3 people have been killed but hit and runs can happen any time anywhere.

Also the police in this country aren't corrupt and inept.

 

[Bun]

Allegory of the Cave - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

@ benchmeh

 

[Burgey]

4) England doesn't have a recent history of players involved with match fixing.

 

[Top_Cat]

5) MI6 doesn't directly support terrorist groups.

 

[Spark]

Yeah, um, er...

NO.