Sachin changes his views on Hawkeye

[centurymaker]

Sachin will tell the Indians to perform a U-turn over Hawk-Eye, says its inventor | Mail Online

good news?

 

[Spark]

Haha that will be hilarious if true. Will provide so much fodder for those who say Indian cricket just does whatever Sachin says. Assuming the BCCI do change their stance, that is.

(nothing to do with England's 3rd seamerBroad, by the way, centurymaker - must have been an accident. Moved to a new thread)

 

[centurymaker]

Haha that will be hilarious if true. Will provide so much fodder for those who say Indian cricket just does whatever Sachin says.

(wrong thread, by the way, centurymaker - I've moved it to the most appropriate thread)

lol oooppss
had several windows open so accidently chose the wrong one...

 

[Spark]

Haha that's fine. Done it plenty of times myself.

 

[BoyBrumby]

Mildly sceptical, tbh. Struggle to believe Sachin is so half-sharp he really thought Hawk Eye was operated manually.

 

[Athlai]

Mildly sceptical, tbh. Struggle to believe Sachin is so half-sharp he really thought Hawk Eye was operated manually.

Made it pretty clear that Tendulkar had been misinformed rather than being naturally thick.

 

[Himannv]

Well, that settles it then.

 

[GIMH]

When he was initially told how it worked he probably didn't hear properly

 

[Burgey]

When he was initially told how it worked he probably didn't hear properly

Bam!

 

[pup11]

I guess SRT is probably gonna retire soon hence he this U-turn....

But in all seriousness this is going to be absolute nonsense if ICC keeps bending over to please BCCI all the time, they need to make a stand regarding the DRS and stick it with because it would be atrocious if the implementation of DRS would keep varying from time to time to suit the Indian team's convenience.

 

[silentstriker]

So how accurate is the Daily Mail?

Would be hilarious if BCCI do indeed change their minds because of him. I think Dhoni is the key player to convince.

 

[benchmark00]

Don't see how anyone could have had a problem with him itbt.

 

[Spark]

Ah, didn't notice it was the daily mail That's a bit of an oversight.

 

[Spikey]

DIRTY FILTHY FOREIGNER SACHIN will tell the Indians to perform a U-turn over Hawk-Eye, says its inventor

a much more Mail-like headline

ain't the BCCI still refusing to even attend a meeting with the hawkeye guy? so like until then...

 

[Howe_zat]

So how accurate is the Daily Mail?

Think Hansie Cronje on a bad day.

 

[Burgey]

DIRTY FILTHY FOREIGNER SACHIN will tell the Indians to perform a U-turn over Hawk-Eye, says its inventor

a much more Mail-like headline

ain't the BCCI still refusing to even attend a meeting with the hawkeye guy? so like until then...

They've had a meeting. Sachin IS the BCCI

 

[oitoitoi]

They've had a meeting. Sachin IS the BCCI

As he should be frankly, no one knows more about this great game.

 

[91Jmay]

As he should be frankly, no one knows more about this great game.

No one knows more than a bloke who thought Hawk-Eye was manually operated

 

[weldone]

A large part of hawk-eye is operated manually.

The operator needs to freeze the frame at the exact moment when the ball hits the pad; otherwise the hawk-eye may lead to highly flawed results.

 

[tesman]

Sachin does U-turn on U-turn

After Billy's unbelievable decision is it likely that (the humble - I will advise BCCI) Sachin will do a U-turn on his U-turn?