|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which is best combination?? | |||
| Zaheer,Ishant & Praveen |
|
20 | 50.00% |
| Zaheer,Ishant & Munaf |
|
3 | 7.50% |
| Zaheer,Ishant & Sreesanth |
|
16 | 40.00% |
| Zaheer,Sreesanth & Praveen |
|
1 | 2.50% |
| Zaheer,Sreesanth & Munaf |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
U19 Vice-Captain
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Haryana,India
Posts: 527
|
Ishant Sharma has been superb in WI & this makes the Indian pace attack look stronger for England tour.With Zaheer coming back,it won't be easy for the English batsmen to get big scores.But there would be a good competetion between the Indian seamers for a spot in the line-up.Zaheer & Ishant are automatic selections at this point of time & the third seamer will be one of these three - Praveen/Munaf/Sreesanth.
I would go for Praveen because of his swing capabilities & also he has got a good start to his test career so he would be high on confidence.
__________________
cricdiary.wordpress.com My dream & the greatest XI ever. A.Gilchrist (wk),S.Tendulkar (c),J.Kallis,A.Flower,J.Rhodes,C.Cairns,L.Klusener ,H.Streak,S.Pollock,S.Mushtaq,S.Bond |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
State Captain
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pune
Posts: 1,857
|
I'd like nothing more than Sree getting selected, having a killer tour and settling into the team alongside Zaheer and Ishant, but think Praveen and Munaf are also good shouts for England. Wouldn't mind any of them getting a go.
Speaking of which, I know Munaf is a very different bowler now, but how awesome he was vs England in Mohali! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
U19 Vice-Captain
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Haryana,India
Posts: 527
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: z
Posts: 5,882
|
It's pretty harsh on Sree and I wub him most dearly but you cannot drop Praveen or Ishant now and Zaheer is Zaheer.
__________________
Isn’t it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too? – Douglas Adams |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
International 12th Man
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 1,730
|
Quote:
The 125 kph guy makes them play all the time, while the 140 kph swing bowler specializes in the corridor of unreachability. Besides, he is mentally unstable IMHO, and it's very difficult for a captain to trust him to do a consistent job with the ball. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
International 12th Man
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 1,730
|
Ishant seems to have found his pace and rhythm back and that makes him and Zaheer the first two candidates in my book.
PK has been swinging the red cherry beautifully and the control that he displays is exceptional. I do think that sometimes pace tends to get over-rated. A guy who is super-accurate and swings it at 77-79 mph isn't going to be as easy to cart around the park as many people seem to think. Truth be told, apart from a few modern batsmen, I don't see many guys having something remotely resembling a technique when it comes to tackling late movement. A genuine swing bowler (in-the-air rather than off-the-pitch types) is more worthy at this point of time than any other, IMHO. I'd back PK to achieve a lot in his test career. Sreesanth, as I said before, is hugely inconsistent and laughably indisciplined for a test-playing adult. So, Zaheer + Sharma + Kumar would be the way to go, if I were the skipper/selector. Last edited by Outswinger@Pace; 09-07-2011 at 04:52 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wellywood, NZ
Posts: 26,001
|
Can't see Praveen troubling some of the bigger batting lineups though unless the ball swings around corners. Sreesanth if he isn't playing like rubbish (which he does sometimes play like) has something of an X-factor about him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | ||
|
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Jeets' sheets
Posts: 23,377
|
That's the thing though. In unfavourable conditions against a beastly batting line up, would you take the swing bowling medium pacer who can at least keep things tight or the quicker, less accurate, less swingy bowler who might have a one game in twenty pearler or carry on with his pie chucking ways, probably hitting a team mate with his handbag again for good measure?
I'd probably just play the second spinner in that situation if the medium pacer really struggled.
__________________
Direbirds FTL! Quote:
Quote:
President of T.I.T.S Tamim Isn't Talented Society Proudly supporting Central Districts RIP Craig Walsh |
||
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bradman to Sehwag - Redefining Great Batsmanship Through Defying Tradition | SJS | Cricket Chat | 134 | 29-12-2009 05:01 PM |
| Mahela Keeps Indian bowlers at bay in Motera- Srilankas Tour to India | miheershah | Cricket Chat | 2 | 18-11-2009 04:48 PM |