dravid1830
Banned
Srilanka or WI ? I am giving my vote to WI.
safricahow would one rank the best attacks in cricket
england
safrica
west indies
pakistan
india
australia
new zealand
sri lanka
bangladesh
about right?
England vs SA at the top is contentious but I'll go with that. Depends how much credit you give Swann, really.how would one rank the best attacks in cricket
england
safrica
west indies
pakistan
india
australia
new zealand
sri lanka
bangladesh
about right?
two tbhReckon the aussie attack is really underrated on here due to one bad series.
They might have done better if the selectors just stuck with the 4 or 5 best bowlers + Watson as all rounder instead of picking 10+ over the last 7 tests.Reckon the aussie attack is really underrated on here due to one bad series.
Reckon the aussie attack is really underrated on here due to one bad series.
Depending on how you think they went in India last autumn, it's either two or three.two tbh
400 was about par on those pitches first dig though. The bowlers did fine, it's two big second innings collapses that really cost us (and obviously not getting Sharma/Laxman out with a reduced attack). It's rough to say the bowling - Hauritz aside - underperformed in that series.Depending on how you think they went in India last autumn, it's either two or three.
On the one hand they stopped India, in India, from posting over 500 in four attempts, and got into a position to win in Mohali.
On the other hand, India got 400+ in both first innings, couldn't get rid of the tail in Mohali or defend a decent score in Bangalore, and still lost both matches despite batting reasonably well.
Then there's the Pakistan series, where there's no question the front line bowlers performed badly.
I agree, a attack of say Bollinger, Johnson and Siddle is a very decent attack, with Hauritz doing the spinners job, better than a fair few attacks out there.Reckon the aussie attack is really underrated on here due to one bad series.