vcs
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ajit Agarkar - 26 Tests, 571 runs@16.79, 58 wickets@47.32
Darren Sammy - 13 Tests, 379 runs@17.22, 39 wickets@27.66
I feel we must settle this question of who is the superior cricketer between two absolute titans of their respective eras. On the face of it, Sammy would appear to have the better stats, but this is balanced out by the fact that Agarkar has a century at the Home of Cricket, and a match-winning 6fer against the mighty Aussies in their prime. Who do you reckon is the better cricketer?
Darren Sammy - 13 Tests, 379 runs@17.22, 39 wickets@27.66
I feel we must settle this question of who is the superior cricketer between two absolute titans of their respective eras. On the face of it, Sammy would appear to have the better stats, but this is balanced out by the fact that Agarkar has a century at the Home of Cricket, and a match-winning 6fer against the mighty Aussies in their prime. Who do you reckon is the better cricketer?