Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Rob Steen on Steve Davies coming out: "should've been a Wisden cricketer of the year"

  1. #1
    U19 Cricketer
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    423

    Rob Steen on Steve Davies coming out: "should've been a Wisden cricketer of the year"

    The Cricinfo columnist Rob Steen wrote an article saying that Steve Davies should have been a Wisden cricketer for his coming out. Although I agree it was a really brave thing to do, I really disagree that he should've been one of ther cricketers of the year. It should be restricted to incidents on the field. Using that logic Henry Olonga and Andy Flower should have been cricketers of the in 2003 with the famous black armband protest.
    The fifth man
    Wisden radically chose to pick four cricketers of the year for 2010. But they could have gone further and picked a player who showed immense courage off the field

    Rob Steen

    April 20, 2011

    Comments: 5 | Login via | Text size: A | A
    Steve Davies: His decision to come out as a homosexual just may give heart to other cricketers who have stayed in the closet for fear of negative reactions © Getty Images

    Enlarge

    Related LinksNews : Steven Davies reveals he is gay
    Players/Officials: Steve Davies | Stuart Leary
    Teams: England


    As a statement of heartfelt principle, it defied argument. As one who holds the game dearer than anyone I have ever met, Scyld Berry's decision to break with tradition and trim Wisden's Cricketers of the Year by 20% was worthy of at least four cheers. As a departing gesture from an editor who occupied cricket literature's loftiest throne with distinction, if all too briefly, it was anything but empty.

    It was entirely in keeping with Berry's brazen approach to innovation (we are talking about Wisden, which until the 1990s had moved with all the urgency of a constipated snail). On debut in 2008, he commissioned no fewer than nine past or present players to write essays, reflecting his desire to make the yellow bible "more of a cricketers' almanack"; among his quintessential quintet of 2009 he dared to name Claire Taylor, a woman; now, amusingly yet astutely, he has dubbed the Flower-Strauss axis "the Andocracy".

    This final snook at convention also emphasised Berry's zero-tolerance of match-fixing and match-doctoring (as we henceforth ought to de-dignify the crime known as spot-fixing). Nor was it cocked easily. As David Hopps put it with typical erudition in the Guardian, Berry "was torn between not wishing to stigmatise… ahead of a criminal trial… and the wish to pass moral judgement on a tainted cricketer". And no, he undermined his cause not a jot by electing not to mention Mohammad Amir by name (learned friends were doubtless looking over his shoulder, though perhaps he simply couldn't bring himself to type it, such was his disappointment). But he still didn't go far enough.

    Some will maintain that, while he was about it, he should also have removed the names of Mohammad Azharuddin and Saleem Malik from the scroll of past Cricketers of the Year (fortunately, Hansie Cronje was never so honoured). To this bonfire of the insanities many would add Shane Warne and Mark Waugh, whose willingness to trade information, however mundane, for crisp greenbacks remains an especially thorny issue for subcontinental aficionados, and justly so. To dwell on this budding Hall of Infamy, though, is not terribly constructive.

    No, my small, almost shame-faced misgiving lies with the opportunity Berry missed to celebrate one of the grand old game's proudest yet neglected moments. It may have been overshadowed by the World Cup (the timing, in other words, was pretty much perfect, ditto the way the "Andocracy" handled the affair) but Steven Davies' courage in coming out to his England team-mates last October, and then taking his homosexuality into the public arena in late February, the first active professional cricketer so to do, is worthy of our gratitude and admiration every bit as much as the alleged misdeeds of certain Pakistanis warrant our dismay.

    Context is all, and the British context is particularly illuminating. Look at the major team games, where the deterrents are greatest. The only active openly gay professional rugby player from these isles has been Gareth Thomas, a Welshman who bared all in 2009 while winding up his illustrious career. His lone footballing counterpart, Justin Fashanu, was tormented by his manager, Brian Clough, and ultimately committed suicide. Jon Amaechi, one of the few Britons to bounce his way to the NBA, came out only after retiring. As did Alan Hansford, the lone county cricketer to declare his homosexuality. Fuelled by testosterone and oiled by machismo, professional sport remains a haven for the homophobe.

    Writing in the Guardian under the nom de plume "The Secret Footballer", an anonymous English professional recently contended that integrating one's gayness into a dressing room need not be fraught with insurmountable problems. "I'm pretty sure a gay player would have few problems coming out to his team-mates if he were offered a hypothetical 'nobody outside the team will ever find out' clause. It isn't because we're a superior breed… it is because we're all about looking after ourselves and, consequently, we try not to get too involved with other players' trials and tribulations. The changing room is a very harsh place to survive - say what you like about footballers' lack of intelligence (and people often do), the banter is razor-sharp and anything out of the ordinary is seized upon in a flash. But this is precisely the reason why a gay player would feel comfortable coming out here. A footballer is a footballer, it doesn't matter if you are black, white, straight or gay, players are at ease in this environment, where they are used to piss-taking."




    It was that pretence, that contradictory double existence, that Davies couldn't bear, but what of those who lived in less tolerant times and felt they had no option but to endure?





    In soccer, where audiences and emotions run higher, it is the fans, rather than team-mates, who do most to induce hesitancy. Anton Hysen, an American-bred, Swedish professional who smacked all manner of gobs by coming out last month ("When you consider dumping a supermodel you know you are gay"), told the BBC's Tim Franks about his first brush with hate mail: "I just got mail from somebody who lives around here [Gothenburg]. He said, 'I'm never gonna come to your games again because you got a ****** on your team.' It was hate mail. He started like this: 'Hey you ugly fag, I'm not going to watch your games anymore because you have ruined my life. I'm not going to watch football no more.' I'm like, okay, what do you want me to do? Do you want me go cry in a corner for you? I don't get it."

    Is this is a factor in the reluctance of cricketers, especially those from the more homophobic societies, to out themselves? Perhaps. More significant, as Davies was at pains to stress, it was the uniquely claustrophobic demands of the all-lads-together touring life that he found impossible to come to terms with, forcing his hand. "If I am brutally honest," he admitted, "I've never enjoyed touring because of my secret and having to conceal my sexuality. My friendships with the guys would reach a certain level, then I'd have to take a step back. A two-week tour would feel like two years for me. It was really tough. Cricket was my escape. When I was playing cricket I was at my happiest because all I had to worry about was getting runs and taking catches."

    The next test, the ultimate test, will be the opposition. Or rather, the opposition captain. Will they give explicit instructions to their charges not to use the g-word (or h-word or p-word or whatever) when sledging him? Will they abrogate their responsibilities and leave it up to the individual conscience? To dismiss this as anything less than a delicate matter would be to drastically underestimate the difficulties faced by those forced into a life of pretence, let alone those who make giant leaps for sportingkind.

    It was that pretence, that contradictory double existence, that Davies couldn't bear, but what of those who lived in less tolerant times and felt they had no option but to endure? One can only guess at their identities (and there has been no shortage of conjecture on the county circuit, the subjects numbering at least one captain and a Test player), but one who may conceivably have had to divide himself in this torturous manner was Stuart Leary.

    An allrounder's allrounder from Cape Town, the popular South African distinguished himself for Kent CCC and Charlton Athletic FC between 1951 and 1971 but took his own life in 1988. In By His Own Hand, a brave and tender study of cricketing suicides, first published in 1990, David Frith mentions Leary's fondness for resting a hand on a colleague's knee whenever team photos were being snapped. At the time of his demise - "according to three people who knew him" - Frith depicts him as "not only apprehensive at the nationwide investigation into juvenile vice but feared he was infected by the dreaded disease AIDS". These exhibits prove nothing, of course, but how suggestive they sound. And how dreadfully sad.

    Now Davies has had the cojones to tread fresh, cleansing, honest ground. Others, at all levels and on other sporting fields, will be emboldened and inspired, not least by the mature and relatively sober response that greeted his coming out. But while Mike Atherton claimed it was no hardship for the touring press corps in Australia to keep schtum about Davies' revelation to his team-mates because it was "no big deal", this diminishes the wicketkeeper's dilemma. It was a big deal. A very big deal. To do what Davies did, to be the first over the top, was one of sport's more heroic acts.

    That's why he should have been Wisden's fifth man. No, that heroism did not occur during the English season (hence Alastair Cook's omission from the 2012 fivesome). Yes, it would have meant waiving the rules - but hadn't Berry already done that by nominating a quartet? Memo to his successor, Lawrence Booth: please make amends.
    Rob Steen: The man who should have been a Wisden Cricketer of the Year | Opinion | Cricinfo Magazine | ESPN Cricinfo

    What do you guys think?

    Don't really like Rob Steen to be honest, writes quite a lot of nonsense.

  2. #2
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Uppercut's Avatar
    Tournaments Won: 1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    .
    Posts
    23,364
    Don't think he should've been a cricketer of the year. Davies is more than good enough to get there on cricketing merit, and making him COTY for coming out in 2010 robs him of the opportunity to do so in the future.

    Really enjoyed the article though. Have a lot of respect for what Davies did.
    Quote Originally Posted by zaremba View Post
    The Filth have comfortably the better bowling. But the Gash have the batting. Might be quite good to watch.

  3. #3
    International Coach flibbertyjibber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mrs Miggins pie shop
    Posts
    11,039
    No way should you get to be a cricketer of the year for 'coming out' but i guess you could argue he may have deserved one slot anyway as he had a very good season for a crap Surrey side, certainly that is more worthy than any announcement about his personal life.

  4. #4
    Hall of Fame Member Howe_zat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Top floor, bottom buzzer
    Posts
    15,980
    It's their award, they can do what they like with it really. As has been said, Davies' coming out is admirable - don't get me wrong, for many reasons I've applauded him for it - but it isn't the on-field achievement Wisden looks to recognise.

    Steen seems to be arguing they should change the criteria for the award, but if you change the criteria it's a completely different award. He may as well have argued Davies should have been given a BAFTA.
    Last edited by Howe_zat; 20-04-2011 at 07:20 AM.
    And we still haven't walked in the glow of each other's majestic presence.


  5. #5
    Cricketer Of The Year four_or_six's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    9,189
    Good on Davies for what he did, but making him cricketer of the year would have been pretty daft for a number of reasons. One of which is that the award is for the impact on the English home summer of 2010, and he hadn't even come out then.

  6. #6
    Hall of Fame Member _Ed_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Auckland, Aotearoa
    Posts
    19,848
    Quote Originally Posted by flibbertyjibber View Post
    No way should you get to be a cricketer of the year for 'coming out' but i guess you could argue he may have deserved one slot anyway as he had a very good season for a crap Surrey side, certainly that is more worthy than any announcement about his personal life.
    While I agree he shouldn't have been Cricketer of the Year for it, I think what he did was much more than simply an announcement about his personal life. It should be as insignificant as that, but at the moment it's a pretty big deal - especially considering he was the first to do it.
    Last edited by _Ed_; 20-04-2011 at 07:31 AM.

  7. #7
    Global Moderator Teja.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    z
    Posts
    6,164
    Bit like saying Yuvraj should get the Nobel Prize for Literature for being good in the WC tbh.

    Look I have the deepest of respect for what he did but it's ridiculous to suggest it should have any bearing on whether he is in the Wisden 5 or not. I'd rather give it to a hypothetical 41 year old player about to retire in a year or two who was caught drunk driving and is on record making racist statements but was even slightly better than Davies.

    Steve Davies is an absolute hero though.
    Isn’t it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too? – Douglas Adams



    Quote Originally Posted by GIMH View Post
    The reason people don't cheer for India is nothing to do with them being number one

    It's because Teja is a ****, FTR

  8. #8
    International Captain Jacknife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    West Yorkshire.
    Posts
    6,236
    I'm sure Davies himself, wouldn't want any big song and dance surrounding his personal life, especially giving him a cricket award because of it and I'm also sure he'd rather let his cricket do the talking.

  9. #9
    Hall of Fame Member Furball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Anyone But England
    Posts
    19,670
    Quote Originally Posted by Uppercut View Post
    Don't think he should've been a cricketer of the year. Davies is more than good enough to get there on cricketing merit, and making him COTY for coming out in 2010 robs him of the opportunity to do so in the future.

    Really enjoyed the article though. Have a lot of respect for what Davies did.
    It also cheapens the impact of his coming out if you bestow an award on him on account of his sexuality.

  10. #10
    Bun
    Bun is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Under the tree
    Posts
    3,116
    Quote Originally Posted by GingerFurball View Post
    It also cheapens the impact of his coming out if you bestow an award on him on account of his sexuality.
    Yeah agree...

    And don't think it is anymore heroic than say someone like Dhoni or the Pathans who has risen from nowhere (real rags to riches story). All have done their share of heroic work. Just an overreaction.

    Let's limit the awards scope to cricketing excellence

  11. #11
    Englishman BoyBrumby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Locked up inside my opium den, surrounded by some Chinamen
    Posts
    44,841
    Davis actually had a pretty fair case for his cricket alone.

    Over 1000 FC runs @ nearly 57.5 is a great return for a keeper. Of the players who scored 1000 for the season only Trescothick, Ramprakash and Hildreth averaged more. Would guess the first two have already been honoured.

    Just as a point of interest, the Swedish footballer mentioned in Steen's article is the son of Glenn Hysen, the ex-Liverpool defender.
    Cricket Web's 2013/14 Premier League Tipping Champion

    - As featured in The Independent.

    "The committee discussed the issue of illegal bowling actions, and believed that there are a number of bowlers currently employing suspect actions in international cricket, and that the ICC's reporting and testing procedures are not adequately scrutinising these bowlers."
    - Even the ICC's own official press release thinks things must change

  12. #12
    U19 Cricketer turnstyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    465
    Quote Originally Posted by GingerFurball View Post
    It also cheapens the impact of his coming out if you bestow an award on him on account of his sexuality.
    Yeah this. It'd be like high fiving dolphins because they come from the ocean.

  13. #13
    Cricket Spectator
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    England
    Posts
    21
    No, just no. I sure that Davies himself would like to be recognised purely for his cricket.
    Points to note:

    1) Bradman is the greatest batsman of all time. No debate.

    2) Dravid is the most overrated player of all time. No debate.

    3) If Samaraweera is a home town bully, then M Hussey is a home town bully as well.

    4) The Ashes is the biggest series in the world. No debate.

    5) I'm probably the oldest member on this forum.

    6) I follow every damn cricket match in the world. If school cricket from Zimbabwe was on TV, I'd watch that as well.

  14. #14
    Cricket Web Staff Member Burgey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Castle
    Posts
    41,099
    Quote Originally Posted by turnstyle View Post
    Yeah this. It'd be like high fiving dolphins because they come from the ocean.
    Or Warnie because he's chopping Luz Hurley.
    WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
    "People make me happy.. not places.. people"

    "When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life." - Samuel Johnson

    "Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn

  15. #15
    Virat Kohli (c) Jono's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    54,382
    Quote Originally Posted by GingerFurball View Post
    It also cheapens the impact of his coming out if you bestow an award on him on account of his sexuality.
    Yep, hit the nail on the head.
    "I am very happy and it will allow me to have lot more rice."

    Eoin Morgan on being given a rice cooker for being Man of the Match in a Dhaka Premier Division game.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2003 Wisden Cricketer Of The Year - Ricky Ponting
    By Hoggy in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 02-12-2009, 05:15 AM
  2. Player of the year awards
    By bugssy in forum World Club Cricket
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-02-2005, 01:39 AM
  3. Wisden International Cricketer of the year.
    By Eclipse in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 31-10-2003, 07:06 PM
  4. The Wisden Cricketer
    By Rik in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 26-09-2003, 06:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •