Go Back   Cricket Web > Cricket Discussion > Cricket Chat



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29-03-2011, 01:09 PM   #1 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,198
High Impact - Assessing the Great Batting Performances

Cricket Web - Features: High Impact - Assessing the Great Batting Performances

In this feature, Dave takes a look at the best of those innings which spearheaded a successful run chase.
__________________
Website:
www.chasingthedon.com

Blog:
http://chasingthedon.blogspot.com/
chasingthedon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2011, 01:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
International Coach
 
Ikki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Death Queen Island
Posts: 12,032
Great stuff, thanks. A notable player not in there is Tendulkar. What is the highest one of his knocks came?

Also, I wonder if there is a way of doing this for bowlers - their contribution with regards to the difficulty of their team winning.
__________________
I think there'll sooner be another Bradman than another Warne. - Gidgeon Haigh

[Warne is] the greatest bowler ever produced in this entire world - Muttiah Muralidaran

[Warne is] the greatest bowler of all time - Glenn McGrath


In my opinion Shane Warne is the greatest cricketer who's ever lived - Ian Botham

Warne is the greatest cricketer to pick up a ball ever.
And is the greatest bowler I have ever laid eyes on. - Brian Lara

Last edited by Ikki; 29-03-2011 at 01:36 PM.
Ikki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2011, 01:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikki View Post
Great stuff, thanks. A notable player not in there is Tendulkar. What is the highest one of his knocks came?

Also, I wonder if there is a way of doing this for bowlers - their contribution with regards to the difficulty of their team winning.
Thanks Ikki. Tendulkar's highest rated innings by this measure was his 103*. I'm already working on the bowlers equivalent, should be up in a week or so.
chasingthedon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2011, 01:57 PM   #4 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
robelinda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: at home
Posts: 4,049
No Sachin again- its the Wisden top 100 all over again!!!!!
__________________
My Youtube cricket channels, thousands of gold old videos

http://www.youtube.com/user/robelinda2

http://www.youtube.com/user/robelinda
robelinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-03-2011, 07:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
smalishah84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: dxb
Posts: 18,855
wow......great work.......didn't see it in detail in terms of methodology but a pleasant surprise to see Shakib Al Hasan up there in the top 10
__________________
And smalishah's avatar is the most classy one by far Jan certainly echoes the sentiments of CW

Yeah we don't crap in the first world; most of us would actually have no idea what that was emanating from Ajmal's backside. Why isn't it roses and rainbows like what happens here? PEWS's retort to Ganeshran on Daemon's picture depicting Ajmal's excreta
smalishah84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-03-2011, 11:01 AM   #6 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
fredfertang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: high dudgeon
Posts: 9,714
Fascinating stuff Dave - top 5 probably just about right I suppose - will always have Butcher's as a personal favourite but I suppose that goes with the territory!

Interesting about the 30's - I blame Bradman - killed off most Tests with his first visit to the crease
fredfertang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30-03-2011, 11:50 AM   #7 (permalink)
vcs
International Coach
 
vcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 10,305
Posted by J_C in the comments section..

Quote:
Good analysis. Interestingly Yuvraj makes the list for his 85* even though Sehwag (87) and Tendulkar (103*) don't make the cut. Hmmm....
vcs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-03-2011, 01:19 PM   #8 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by vcs View Post
Posted by J_C in the comments section..

Quote:
Good analysis. Interestingly Yuvraj makes the list for his 85* even though Sehwag (87) and Tendulkar (103*) don't make the cut. Hmmm....
It's all to do with the win probability at the time each batsman came in compared to when he was out or when the game was won - at 163 still to get with six wickets left, India still only had about a one in eight win probability, so Yuvraj gets a higher share than Tendulkar, who came in at 246 to get with eight wickets remaining (about 32.2% share for Tendy). Sehwag's 83 only improved the win probability by about 20% and Sehwag gets around 14% of that.
chasingthedon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-03-2011, 01:23 PM   #9 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by robelinda View Post
No Sachin again- its the Wisden top 100 all over again!!!!!
Sachin's omission from the Wisden list is of far greater significance in my opinion - my analysis looks only at individual innings in successful fourth-innings run chases, whereas the Wisden list considered ALL innings.
chasingthedon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-03-2011, 01:25 PM   #10 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredfertang View Post
Fascinating stuff Dave - top 5 probably just about right I suppose - will always have Butcher's as a personal favourite but I suppose that goes with the territory!

Interesting about the 30's - I blame Bradman - killed off most Tests with his first visit to the crease
Which is of course why he doesn't figure much in this analysis - his Aussie teams didn't figure in many run chases.
chasingthedon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-03-2011, 01:43 PM   #11 (permalink)
vcs
International Coach
 
vcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: India
Posts: 10,305
Quote:
Originally Posted by chasingthedon View Post
It's all to do with the win probability at the time each batsman came in compared to when he was out or when the game was won - at 163 still to get with six wickets left, India still only had about a one in eight win probability, so Yuvraj gets a higher share than Tendulkar, who came in at 246 to get with eight wickets remaining (about 32.2% share for Tendy). Sehwag's 83 only improved the win probability by about 20% and Sehwag gets around 14% of that.
OK.. thanks for explaining your methodology.
vcs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-03-2011, 10:23 PM   #12 (permalink)
State 12th Man
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: India
Posts: 704
pretty flawed to say the least ... there's no way that yuvraj's 85 was in any way close to sehwag's or sachin's knocks , let alone better than both of them ....

where's Mark waugh's 116(?) vs SA btw ?
abmk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2011, 12:58 AM   #13 (permalink)
State Vice-Captain
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: mediterranea
Posts: 1,447
the singh innings of 80 odd that ranks ahead of the 103 of tendulkar's (in the same innings) surely gives the lie to this analysis.
__________________
i know i am god. since when i pray i find i am talking to myself.

(massive apologies to barnes)
hang on is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2011, 01:09 AM   #14 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,334
Or maybe it actually shows that the SRT innings was over-rated as even with it, they were still behind the game and needed another innings to get them there?
__________________
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

Anyone want to join the Society?

Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-03-2011, 01:19 AM   #15 (permalink)
State 12th Man
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: India
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by marc71178 View Post
Or maybe it actually shows that the SRT innings was over-rated as even with it, they were still behind the game and needed another innings to get them there?
huh ? use some logic will you ? so sehwag's innings was also over-rated as even with it 2 other 50s and a hundred was required ?

its insane in how many places people just can't use plain common sense ; common sense is not so common after all !

Last edited by abmk; 31-03-2011 at 01:24 AM.
abmk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where should i improve ash chaulk Battrick 408 05-06-2008 05:59 AM
Archived [18/10/06] : Battrick DJellett Battrick 10623 17-10-2006 12:20 PM
Club Cricket 9-10 Results Mr Mxyzptlk CW Offseason Club Cricket 964 27-04-2006 03:41 PM
**Official** Club Cricket (8-9) Mr Mxyzptlk CW Offseason Club Cricket 742 08-09-2005 07:38 AM
Surrey 2002: A Cricket Captain Diary SIX AND OUT General 6 17-02-2005 08:25 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web