ankitj
Hall of Fame Member
Yup. I think Lara would've been similarly diefied and for same reasons - he is every bit the master that Tendulkar was. Sure, he didn't achieve a few things that Tendulkar did, but equally Lara achieved few things that Tendulkar couldn't.Yeah, he's the most celebrated Indian cricketer of the last two decades for a reason. He's the best one. But imagine if instead of Tendulkar, it was Lara who'd played for India. Do you imagine him being worshipped any less? The public wouldve been just as insane for BCL.
When I think of influential cricketers, I think of guys who influenced the game as a whole. Imran made reverse swing a big big weapon after Sarfraz first really introduced it, Saqlain brought in the doosra, Worrell broke the race barrier and became captain, Jardine's captaincy led to big changes in the rulebook. Tendulkar was a great batsman and a popular bloke, that's about it imo. Not really influential in the strictest sense of the word.
I am not arguing for his influence but that not just anybody who was the best cricketer in that period in India would've had the same fan following.