• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Improvements that need to be made in cricket

dhillon28

U19 Debutant
Let's face it, there are a number of things currently wrong with our game atm and that have been allowed to continue for so long. These issues need to be addressed. Here are a few that I strong feel need attention.

1. As soon as a team wins a match/when a boundary is hit/when two players are squaring up to each other, instead of showing the players (who the whole broadcast is meant to be about) they show the crowd or cheerleaders if t20 match.

2. UDRS- Take it out of the players hands and let there be three independent 3rd umpires who can contact the on field umpires and notify them of obvious howlers, remove hawk eye as it is predictive. If 2/3 umpires, (who are in seperate rooms spot the same obvious mistake, then it can overturn an onfield decision) It is worth it as cricket is such a big sport now, that each game deserves to have 5 active match officials.

3. 3rd umpires from the home country. What is the point of neutral on field umpires if 3rd umpire may have bias?

4. Slow over rates. This is a con for all spectators, especially those who pay admission fee for 90 overs in day of test cricket and only get to see 78. Heavier sanctions need to be introduced.

5. 7 game odi series. WTF. ICC should rule that no more than 5 in a series be permitted to preserve the format.

6. Window for IPL. Commercialised franchise cricket is the best way to spread cricket around the world and the IPL needs to have all the top players competing for the entire tournament.

7. When they show the highlights of a players innings in the middle of a match they show it from the crappiest camera angle that you can't even appreciate any of the shots.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
The only way to remove the predictive element of lbw decisions is to change the lbw law. HawkEye is far more accurate than Cevno watching on TV.

I also lol'd pretty hard at #1. If that's the #1 issue in our game, we're going fantastically...
 

dhillon28

U19 Debutant
Whereas the human eye is much more accurate.......
lol....this is coming from someone who doesnt even know how the techonology works.....for all you know, hawkeye could be a pile of crap just randomnly blurting out predictions.

in certain instances the human eye has been proved to be more accurate than hawk eye. hawk eye isnt even reliable at predicting where a ball even pitches, let alone deciding how much its gonna turn (how does it assess revolutions on the ball, amount of friction in the rough etc) and how much its gonna bounce (how does it assess bounce of the wicket esp when alot of wickets these days have uneven bounce)

hey but the good thing is that kiwininja is gonna explain all these answers to everyone thsi forum because he very clever. Clever enough at least to make sarcastic comments on hawk eye since he has thoroughly tested the techonology.

Reason why hawk eye shouldnt be used.........because i wouldnt like to be hung on that evidence.
 

dhillon28

U19 Debutant
The only way to remove the predictive element of lbw decisions is to change the lbw law. HawkEye is far more accurate than Cevno watching on TV.

I also lol'd pretty hard at #1. If that's the #1 issue in our game, we're going fantastically...
I never said they were ranked in order. Secondly if you dont think viewing the interactions betwenn cricket players at crucial points of the match is more important than watching the crowd, then I dont know how you can call yourself a cricket fan. I wouldnt say hawk eye is necessarily more accurate than the human eye. How can you guarantee the accuracy of something you dont understand? There have been many instances when hawk has made howlers.
 
Last edited:

TumTum

Banned
lol....this is coming from someone who doesnt even know how the techonology works.....for all you know, hawkeye could be a pile of crap just randomnly blurting out predictions.
If it was random, you would know it. Hawk-eye has almost* always been accurate.

*Although once in NZ it didn't function probably and gave something completely ridiculous. But that just happened once and was very obvious.

in certain instances the human eye has been proved to be more accurate than hawk eye. hawk eye isnt even reliable at predicting where a ball even pitches, let alone deciding how much its gonna turn (how does it assess revolutions on the ball, amount of friction in the rough etc) and how much its gonna bounce (how does it assess bounce of the wicket esp when alot of wickets these days have uneven bounce)
If the ball has already pitched, hawk-eye continues the path after it hits the pad. This takes into account everything, including: Amount of Spin, Amount of Swing, Bounce etc etc

The only thing it can not predict is newly developing swing AFTER contact, but neither can the human eye can it? Since it has never happened.
 
Last edited:

Spark

Global Moderator
The only thing it can not predict is newly developing swing AFTER contact, but neither can the human eye can it? Since it has never happened.
Well, it might, but the laws of cricket dictate that it shouldn't.
 

Jigga988

State 12th Man
The problem with the UDRS is imo largely time related, 3 third umpires deliberating over one umpires decision without the help of technology will only exhaserbate the problem...
 

robinjr

School Boy/Girl Captain
Yes cut off two months out of a year from test cricket and hand it over to a domestic hit & giggle tournament.Sensational
 

Top